FLAC -0 ... -8, What is your compression level? |
FLAC -0 ... -8, What is your compression level? |
 Nov 3 2007, 06:28
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1315 Joined: 3-January 05 From: Argentina, Bs As Member No.: 18803  |
What makes FLAC so widely used? Because it's asymmetric? Are people satisfied enough by compression ratio or is it price for high decoding speed?
Last time I start to compress my CD rips with even more asymmetric settings: -l 12 -b 1152 -r 6 -e Compression ratio is as of -4 preset but decode speed is higher than for -3 and 10% slower than -0. It's of course at cost of lower encoding speed than of -4 preset. |
 |
 
|
 |
|
Nov 5 2007, 15:01
Post
#2
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 964 Joined: 29-December 01 Member No.: 830 |
QUOTE (IgorC @ Nov 3 2007, 00:28)  What makes FLAC so widely used? Because it's asymmetric? Are people satisfied enough by compression ratio or is it price for high decoding speed? Perhaps one of the most significant factors in FLAC's public adoption was the embrace of the taper-friendly touring band community. Shorten was, as Synthetic Soul intimated, originally the choice for trading such material, but as FLAC achieved superior speed and compression ratios - and given it's cross-platform compatibility (another big factor for live audio archivists) - it soon supplanted Shorten as the codec of choice. Arguably, Monkey's Audio was at one point vying for the same status... but given the number of systems on which the decoding of APE files was simply too processor-intensive to be feasible on a large scale, it is (mostly) only among the fans of certain bands that Monkey's Audio is still considered a desirable trade format. - M. |
|
|
|
IgorC FLAC -0 ... -8 Nov 3 2007, 06:28
Synthetic Soul It is interesting to see, so far, that the compres... Nov 3 2007, 11:14 guruboolez -8
On my side encoding speed is perfect for CD Rip... Nov 3 2007, 11:30 Mitch A -5, I've always just used this 9 (Being the de... Nov 3 2007, 11:37 user QUOTE (IgorC @ Nov 3 2007, 06:28) What ma... Nov 3 2007, 12:56 drbeachboy I use -8 now, though I was using -6 for a very lon... Nov 3 2007, 16:21 Clear89 QUOTE (drbeachboy @ Nov 3 2007, 15:21) I ... Nov 3 2007, 16:34 Borisz I never understood, what does -A tukey(0.5) -A fla... Nov 3 2007, 16:41 verbajim I've gone the other way, from 8 to 6 because I... Nov 3 2007, 18:53 beto -5 for me. I used to use -8 but since there is no ... Nov 3 2007, 19:42 lunkhead 5, but maybe i'll try 6.
did you have to incl... Nov 3 2007, 19:57 Synthetic Soul QUOTE (user @ Nov 3 2007, 11:56) flac was... Nov 3 2007, 19:57
jcoalson QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ Nov 3 2007, 13:57... Nov 5 2007, 20:34 GeSomeone QUOTE (jcoalson @ Nov 5 2007, 20:34) depe... Nov 5 2007, 22:52 Engywuck I usually use -8, since even when ripping 2 CDs si... Nov 5 2007, 10:19 Bad Monkey QUOTE (Engywuck @ Nov 5 2007, 22:19) I us... Nov 5 2007, 14:41 Borisz QUOTE (M @ Nov 5 2007, 16:01) QUOTE (Igor... Nov 5 2007, 18:28 verbajim QUOTE (Bad Monkey @ Nov 5 2007, 14:41) I ... Nov 5 2007, 20:26 Bad Monkey QUOTE (verbajim @ Nov 6 2007, 08:26) QUOT... Nov 8 2007, 09:27 EagleScout1998 QUOTE (Bad Monkey @ Nov 8 2007, 03:27) No... Nov 17 2007, 23:37 Seiitsu -8
It encodes really really fast for me... so no ... Nov 5 2007, 20:30 probedb QUOTE (Seiitsu @ Nov 5 2007, 19:30) -8
I... Nov 8 2007, 09:24 ArtMustHurt -8 here as well Nov 10 2007, 18:19 collector In the longhelp I read that -8 and -7 have -e embe... Nov 17 2007, 13:58 Bourne I hope Blue-Ray/HD-DVD Players come with FLAC supp... Nov 17 2007, 23:47 IgorC QUOTE (Bourne @ Nov 17 2007, 14:47) I hop... Nov 18 2007, 00:08 djdust Complete newbie thickie here so, apologies if this... Dec 2 2007, 17:48 SamHain86 @ DJdust:
The 0-8 is the compression setting. With... Dec 2 2007, 17:52 djdust QUOTE (SamHain86 @ Dec 2 2007, 16:52) @ D... Dec 2 2007, 18:57 damaki QUOTE (SamHain86 @ Dec 2 2007, 17:52) @ D... Dec 2 2007, 19:49 SamHain86 @ Damaki:
... AH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!-
You near... Dec 2 2007, 20:02 miranon I use -6. Best compromise for me between 7-8 and 5... Feb 6 2008, 19:55 naturfreak Default setting (-5), I don't care about 0.5% ... Feb 6 2008, 20:48 ArtMustHurt i use -6, i ripped a bunch of cds last night and r... Mar 11 2008, 13:09 2tec Using -8 myself, why compromise? Besides with mult... Apr 20 2008, 15:59 KFal When I ripped the entire CD collection of my girl ... Apr 6 2009, 10:26 insane_alien -8
it shaves a few gigabytes off my collection a... Apr 6 2009, 13:40 Angenial QUOTE (IgorC @ Nov 2 2007, 21:28) What ma... Apr 6 2009, 18:08 madoka@ex-sounds -8
for peace of my mind Apr 6 2009, 18:30 _mē_ -8.
Considering that I don't plan recoding mor... Apr 7 2009, 20:25 ktf QUOTE (_mē_ @ Apr 7 2009, 21:25) -8 -A tu... Apr 13 2009, 18:42 tev777 --best here. Why use any other setting when you ca... Apr 8 2009, 03:53 ottl -8. As many, I think the extra wait is no problem ... Apr 8 2009, 10:41 sshd -5 is a good default choice.
-8 is a waste of ti... Apr 8 2009, 11:29 JJZolx Less than zero.
--max-lpc-order=0 --disable-c... Apr 20 2009, 02:52 frozenspeed What the heck is flattop? Apr 20 2009, 03:31 Justin Ruggles QUOTE (frozenspeed @ Apr 19 2009, 22:31) ... Apr 20 2009, 14:37 hazumi-san I just started using flac and I used the -8....
en... Apr 24 2009, 15:45 ManekiNeko Flac -8 makes virtually no difference in compressi... May 3 2009, 15:36 acetylcholine -8 for me.
Using a multi-core processor and it ta... May 5 2009, 10:10 hero The final size doesn't really differ between t... May 11 2009, 20:42 doccolinni I use -8. I really don't have any trouble at a... May 29 2009, 12:18 collector -6, seems to be the best of both worlds. And I... May 30 2009, 11:43 jmcguckin I've been using -8 for several years now, only... Jun 22 2009, 17:11 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 11:10 |
