.Ogg Vorbis aotuv, Question for Aoyumi |
  |
.Ogg Vorbis aotuv, Question for Aoyumi |
 Feb 22 2008, 14:16
Post
#26
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 13 Joined: 7-August 06 Member No.: 33772  |
 count me in!Give Ogg a boost again! |
 |
 
|
|
Feb 22 2008, 15:44
Post
#27
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 25 Joined: 27-January 08 Member No.: 50850 |
I like it for my rockbox nano and it's one of the best lossy formats for my Squeezebox. I very much would be interested in a new release. Thank you for the last.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 24 2008, 02:43
Post
#28
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 109 Joined: 4-July 06 Member No.: 32545 |
Yeah, i'll just say +1 and thanks for your hard work. Any improvement is of course a welcome improvement, this codec is excellent for quality and filesize.
- Spike |
|
|
|
|
Feb 25 2008, 14:22
Post
#29
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 64 Joined: 27-May 04 Member No.: 14361 |
Another "yes" vote, and a big "thank you" to Aoyumi for making the codec so good already.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 25 2008, 21:24
Post
#30
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 88 Joined: 8-July 04 Member No.: 15139 |
Another thanks and hoping for another release!
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 25 2008, 22:49
Post
#31
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 142 Joined: 13-December 04 Member No.: 18660 |
one more.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 26 2008, 04:13
Post
#32
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 27 Joined: 14-January 06 Member No.: 27105 |
I use Vorbis on my portable Samsung player. It's the best lossy codec, and Aoyumi made it better. Aoyumi is number one! Thanks for your work!
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 26 2008, 12:44
Post
#33
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 284 Joined: 13-January 02 From: Sthlm, Sweden Member No.: 999 |
+1
I use Vorbis for all portable use. Thanks for all the effort put into this great project. I can only hope for Ogg Vorbis to survive. -------------------- http://forum.studio.se (in Swedish)
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 26 2008, 19:46
Post
#34
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 38 Joined: 4-January 08 Member No.: 50127 |
I also use this version to squeeze music on to my portable player at about 64 kbps. I mostly use this for transcribing/learning songs so the quality doesn't have to be perfect. Very much appreciate your efforts at the low bit rates here!
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 26 2008, 21:15
Post
#35
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 115 Joined: 15-October 03 Member No.: 9325 |
Another vote here.
Thank you so much for everything you've done -------------------- http://www.last.fm/user/mattimeo18
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 29 2008, 11:09
Post
#36
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 57 Joined: 30-September 06 Member No.: 35783 |
But sure. Here is the next PRO vote !
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 1 2008, 01:32
Post
#37
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 11 Joined: 27-November 05 Member No.: 26042 |
QUOTE (Aoyumi @ Feb 21 2008, 10:15)  OK. I begin the work that is necessary for release of beta5.5. Thank you for many statements. Great News!!! Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 1 2008, 03:59
Post
#38
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 735 Joined: 19-March 06 Member No.: 28599 |
I just found out that the new cheap SONY flash based mp3 players they all play OGG now... So I'm considering! Not sure as why the aouTuV b5 is the recommended encoder since it introduces noise in the high frequencies...
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 1 2008, 07:18
Post
#39
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 116 Joined: 2-December 05 From: Netherlands Member No.: 26157 |
QUOTE (Bourne @ Mar 1 2008, 04:59) I just found out that the new cheap SONY flash based mp3 players they all play OGG now... So I'm considering! Not sure as why the aouTuV b5 is the recommended encoder since it introduces noise in the high frequencies... AFAIK It only introduces noise if you increase the low-pass settings far over the default value. |
|
|
|
|
Mar 1 2008, 21:01
Post
#40
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 735 Joined: 19-March 06 Member No.: 28599 |
the noise shows up with "-s %r -Q -q5,000000 - -o %d" which is pretty standard in FB2K, no low-pass setting... You just can't see the noise if you encode with q3 and below because the lowpass will be automatically lower.
can anyone tell me if libvorbis 1.2.0 has aotuv4.5/R1 incorporated into the code? This post has been edited by Bourne: Mar 1 2008, 21:04 |
|
|
|
|
Mar 1 2008, 21:13
Post
#41
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 470 Joined: 26-October 01 From: Germany Member No.: 352 |
QUOTE (Bourne @ Mar 1 2008, 21:01) can anyone tell me if libvorbis 1.2.0 has aotuv4.5/R1 incorporated into the code? I'm not sure, but if I remember correctly autuv beta 2 was the last to be merged into libvorbis. 1.2.0 brings additional fixes, but no aotuv tunings. |
|
|
|
|
Mar 1 2008, 23:58
Post
#42
|
|
 Group: Developer Posts: 2984 Joined: 2-December 07 Member No.: 49183 |
QUOTE (Bourne @ Mar 1 2008, 23:01) can anyone tell me if libvorbis 1.2.0 has aotuv4.5/R1 incorporated into the code? http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/vorbis/CHANGES: libvorbis 1.1.0 (2004-09-22) -- "Xiph.Org libVorbis I 20040629" * merges tuning improvements from Aoyumi's aoTuV with fixups readme.txt from oggenc_aoTuV_b5.zip: "Since beta2 was adopted as official 1.1, beta3 uses 1.1 as a base" That's all. |
|
|
|
 Mar 2 2008, 01:02
Post
#43
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 90 Joined: 14-December 07 From: space Member No.: 49531 |
QUOTE (Aoyumi @ Feb 21 2008, 09:15) OK. I begin the work that is necessary for release of beta5.5. Thank you for many statements. Thank You for everything you've done, it's appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 3 2008, 20:45
Post
#44
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 56 Joined: 17-October 07 From: Cyprus Member No.: 47932 |
Where do u see noise on Q5 Bourne? im using AoTuV b5 encoder at Q5 and i tested it with the original wav many times and i havent noticed noise at that quality.
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 4 2008, 19:17
Post
#45
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 735 Joined: 19-March 06 Member No.: 28599 |
Ayoumi have acknowledged the problem so you don't need to be looking for it
(and I'm too lazy to explain now...) This post has been edited by Bourne: Mar 4 2008, 19:17 |
|
|
|
|
Mar 5 2008, 09:40
Post
#46
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 56 Joined: 17-October 07 From: Cyprus Member No.: 47932 |
Then i hope he can focus more on this problem at the specific bitrates that causes it on his new beta 5.5 release.
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 17 2008, 06:23
Post
#47
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 69 Joined: 12-January 02 Member No.: 996 |
I see Aoyumi has already agreed to release a new version, but for what it's worth, I'm in favor as well.
Ogg vorbis is my singular favorite codec, so I'm always in favor of anything that strengthens it!
This post has been edited by Jerethi: Mar 17 2008, 06:24 |
|
|
|
|
Mar 31 2008, 14:59
Post
#48
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 236 Joined: 14-January 04 From: Kanto, Japan Member No.: 11215 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 31 2008, 15:44
Post
#49
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 67 Joined: 6-September 05 Member No.: 24363 |
Thanks Aoyumi!
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 31 2008, 16:55
Post
#50
|
|
 xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer Group: Developer Posts: 3708 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Bracknell, UK Member No.: 111 |
QUOTE (Aoyumi @ Mar 31 2008, 13:59) A full set of compiles will be available at Rarewares a little later. You will notice that oggenc2.85 and oggdropXPd1.9.0 in aoTuVb5.5 flavours have grown quite considerably in size. This is due to the inclusion of the new 0.1.3 release of libsamplerate as the built in resampler. According to Erik, the medium and best options are now of notably higher quality. -------------------- John
---------------------------------------------------------------- My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/ |
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 18:56 |
