Lossless mp3 |
Lossless mp3 |
Mar 3 2008, 01:30
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 3-March 08 Member No.: 51741 |
Will we ever see an option where we can encode a song to mp3 format and have it be lossless?
Since mp3 format is one of the most wildly used formats I'm surprised there isn't an option for lossless comprerssion. It sucks having only ALAC as the only option for lossless compression for the iPod. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Mar 3 2008, 02:06
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 3083 Joined: 1-September 05 From: SE Pennsylvania Member No.: 24233 |
Will we ever see an option where we can encode a song to mp3 format and have it be lossless? Since mp3 format is one of the most wildly used formats I'm surprised there isn't an option for lossless comprerssion. It sucks having only ALAC as the only option for lossless compression for the iPod. No, that is not possible. |
|
|
|
Mar 3 2008, 02:54
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 17 Joined: 4-January 08 Member No.: 50134 |
Will we ever see an option where we can encode a song to mp3 format and have it be lossless? Since mp3 format is one of the most wildly used formats I'm surprised there isn't an option for lossless comprerssion. It sucks having only ALAC as the only option for lossless compression for the iPod. No, that is not possible. ---------- Why is it not possible? Is there a supernatural force that stops the programmers of LAME from putting in a switch that does this? |
|
|
|
Mar 3 2008, 02:59
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 127 Joined: 11-April 06 Member No.: 29396 |
Is there a supernatural force that stops the programmers of LAME from putting in a switch that does this? No, just the small problem that the resulting file wouldn't be an mp3 anymore (and definitely wouldn't play in your iPod). Moderation: Please keep quotations at a reasonable level. Only quote what you're replying to, and save my scrollwheel some wear. This post has been edited by JensRex: Mar 6 2008, 10:18 |
|
|
|
Mar 3 2008, 03:01
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 17 Joined: 4-January 08 Member No.: 50134 |
No, just the small problem that the resulting file wouldn't be an mp3 anymore (and definitely wouldn't play in your iPod). Why couldn't it be an mp3? Can one not turn a wav file into an mp3 without making the mp3 lossy? Just make it into the mp3 file structure? Moderation: Please keep quotations at a reasonable level. Only quote what you're replying to, and save my scrollwheel some wear. This post has been edited by JensRex: Mar 6 2008, 10:17 |
|
|
|
Mar 8 2008, 08:23
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 64 Joined: 16-June 07 Member No.: 44412 |
Why couldn't it be an mp3? Can one not turn a wav file into an mp3 without making the mp3 lossy? Just make it into the mp3 file structure? NO. 1. MP3 was designed as lossy and heavily relies on transformations that are lossy ... no way to "remove the loss" 2. You "can" hack LAME to "remove the loss" - but it's pointless, you will get either a uncompressed WAV with wrong header/frames, or a FLAC or WAVPACK with wrong header, or whatever broken file, but it definitely won't play in any "MP3 player" 3. Seems you don't know what "MP3" is: it is a proprietary and lossy audio compression algorithm 4. There is also digital audio beyond MP3 5. If you need lostless, why don't you use just FLAC, WAVPACK or TAK ? All those are free and open source (TAK hopefully soon), unlike MP3 6. You should "push" the audio player (not "MP3-player") manufacturers to add support for FLAC, WAVPACK, TAK and OGG VORBIS, rather than LAME devels to "remove the loss" Bourne wrote: QUOTE Lossless formats are nothing but data compressors just like ZIP/RAR. If "nothing" else, they are considerably smarter and compress better ... remember that WiNZip 13 just uses WAVPACK ... thus the "good" results are due to the WAVPACK algorithm, not the Deflate (standard of ZIP) algorithm -------------------- /\/\/\/\/\/\
|
|
|
|
ge0rgieee Lossless mp3 Mar 3 2008, 01:30
m_l If you have iPod which is supported by Rockbox you... Mar 3 2008, 01:34
ge0rgieee the battery life, stability and possibility of bri... Mar 3 2008, 01:58
Soap QUOTE (ge0rgieee @ Mar 2 2008, 19:58) the... Mar 3 2008, 02:06
joeshrubbery QUOTE Why couldn't it be an mp3? Can one not t... Mar 3 2008, 03:54
j7n RAR (and I think ACE, UHA too) included "mult... Mar 8 2008, 15:52
Bourne - Mar 3 2008, 04:39
SamHain86 QUOTE (Bourne @ Mar 3 2008, 04:39) I also... Mar 5 2008, 15:16
DVDdoug QUOTE ...the resulting file wouldn't be an mp3... Mar 4 2008, 21:35
Nick E QUOTE (DVDdoug @ Mar 4 2008, 14:35) Yes... Mar 5 2008, 15:32
Bourne - Mar 4 2008, 23:24
ZinCh trolling imo ;D Mar 5 2008, 13:45
pdq Okay so the original question, why not a lossless ... Mar 5 2008, 16:30
SamHain86 QUOTE (pdq @ Mar 5 2008, 16:30) Okay so t... Mar 5 2008, 18:25
Porcus Necromancing an old thread.
As far as I understa... Mar 26 2012, 16:38
lvqcl Any encoder will compress silence losslessly. Mar 26 2012, 18:05
Nessuno QUOTE (lvqcl @ Mar 26 2012, 18:05) Any en... Mar 26 2012, 18:19
Porcus :-P
Oh, it could be worse. Think of all the terr... Mar 26 2012, 18:52
Andavari QUOTE (lvqcl @ Mar 26 2012, 12:05) Any en... Mar 26 2012, 21:08
flaminio QUOTE (lvqcl @ Mar 26 2012, 10:05) Any en... Mar 28 2012, 15:47
Porcus QUOTE (flaminio @ Mar 28 2012, 16:47) So ... Mar 28 2012, 15:53
felix26591 For an ipod, why not just use AAC, a bitrate of 16... Mar 26 2012, 23:06
.alexander. HD AAC is backward compatible Mar 27 2012, 07:37![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th May 2013 - 09:06 |