Bug: WMA Track Numbers Are Added To By 1 in 0.9.5.1 |
Please read foobar2000 Tech Support Forum Rules before posting and comply with all the points.
Failure to provide all the information pointed out in the above document in your post is considered wasting other people's time and in extreme cases will lead to your topic getting locked without a reply.
See also: Hydrogenaudio Terms of Service.
![]() ![]() |
Bug: WMA Track Numbers Are Added To By 1 in 0.9.5.1 |
Mar 11 2008, 16:45
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 7 Joined: 10-March 08 From: United Kingdom Member No.: 51923 |
Don't know if this bug has already been experienced/reported but when using 0.9.5.1 I'm finding my track numbers for WMA files are being added to by 1. Is there any quick fix or solution to this problem? Am I doing something wrong? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks.
Can anybody help? I've had no response yet. This post has been edited by ff.eternal: Mar 11 2008, 21:55 -------------------- foobar2000 0.9.5.1 user
|
|
|
|
Mar 12 2008, 03:05
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: FB2K Moderator Posts: 2359 Joined: 30-November 07 Member No.: 49158 |
It might be helpful if you wrote what exactly were you trying to do, what did you expect and what behavior occured instead - e.g. "I have an untagged WMA file, I set its Track number to 6 in the Properties dialog, click OK and it shows up as 7".
-------------------- Full-quoting makes you scroll past the same junk over and over.
|
|
|
|
Mar 12 2008, 10:18
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 7 Joined: 10-March 08 From: United Kingdom Member No.: 51923 |
Ok, I add WMA files to library and they automatically get the Track Number increased by 1. No editing whatsoever.
-------------------- foobar2000 0.9.5.1 user
|
|
|
|
Apr 8 2008, 19:24
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 3-April 08 Member No.: 52523 |
I have this issue with WMA tracks using 9.5.1. It affects some of the tracks and not others, but I dont know why. Here are two sample files:
[removed] This post has been edited by shoe: Apr 8 2008, 21:51 |
|
|
|
Apr 8 2008, 21:38
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 247 Joined: 10-April 03 From: Tampere, Finland Member No.: 5911 |
First of all, I'd get those files offline ASAP if I were you, at least remove the links, since they are violating the TOS of hydrogenaudio.org (they are copyrighted material, and as far as I know, you don't own the copyright to Blue Öyster Cult). Second, there is no bug in foobar2000, or then there is one in Windows Media Player as well.
It seems that teh tag in them has a tracknumber of 10. It doesn't matter what the filename is if you've tagged them wrongly. ![]() I have this issue with WMA tracks using 9.5.1. It affects some of the tracks and not others, but I dont know why. Here are two sample files:
Track 9 (off by 1).wma (5.27 MB) Track 10 (correct).wma (5.98 MB) This post has been edited by DotNoir: Apr 8 2008, 21:39 -------------------- Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe
|
|
|
|
Apr 8 2008, 22:10
Post
#6
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 3-April 08 Member No.: 52523 |
First of all, I'd get those files offline ASAP if I were you, at least remove the links, since they are violating the TOS of hydrogenaudio.org (they are copyrighted material, and as far as I know, you don't own the copyright to Blue Öyster Cult). Gone.QUOTE Second, there is no bug in foobar2000, or then there is one in Windows Media Player as well. Earlier the tags matched the file names, but were displayed wrong in Foobar2000. I used Foobar2000 to add replaygain info to the tags, and it seems that while it was doing this, it changed the track number in the tags as well. So the problem with Foobar2000 is real, but I didn't realize the files I posted had been modified since I checked the tags.It seems that teh tag in them has a tracknumber of 10. It doesn't matter what the filename is if you've tagged them wrongly. I will try to find some copyright-free WMA files that will illustrate the problem. |
|
|
|
Apr 8 2008, 23:27
Post
#7
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 377 Joined: 1-April 05 From: California Member No.: 21106 |
I can't repro your problem. Are you generating these WMA files yourself? If not, try it... rip a real audio CD to WMA in WMP 11, for example, and see if foobar2000 is happy with the track numbers.
I can change the track numbers in Explorer shell , WMP 11 & foobar2000 9.5.1 and all applications see the changes correctly. FYI: WMA/ASF containers have two internal track number attributes, WM/TrackNumber (string) and the deprecated WM/Track (string or DWORD). The old "WM/Track" is 0 based, where the newer "WM/TrackNumber" is 1 based. Yes, confusing. WM/Track is only maintained for backwards compatibility. Both attributes should be Strings, but applications should be coded to be able to read WM/Track as a DWORD just in case of bad applications. Buggy applications might store WM/Track incorrectly using a 1 base, making correctly behaving applications read the track +1. This post has been edited by grommet: Apr 9 2008, 08:48 |
|
|
|
Apr 9 2008, 00:23
Post
#8
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 3-April 08 Member No.: 52523 |
I saw the problem with WMAs that I purchased online. I noticed the problem in foobar2k
This post has been edited by shoe: Apr 10 2008, 00:19 |
|
|
|
Apr 9 2008, 03:03
Post
#9
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 470 Joined: 26-October 01 From: Germany Member No.: 352 |
I've also seen this happen (+1 to tracknumer)
|
|
|
|
Apr 10 2008, 00:16
Post
#10
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 3-April 08 Member No.: 52523 |
It turns out the problem does not occur with WMA files that I rip or tag myself. However, WMA files I purchased on the internet show the track number off by one in Foobar2000, but show up correctly on my Gigabeat portable player, and Tag&Rename, and Windows Media Player, and Windows XP Explorer (see pic). If I re-tag the file in Tag&Rename, then Foobar2000 shows the tag number correctly.
Here is a pic that shows the correct track number for "Just another day" is 1, but Foobar2k shows it as 2. foobar2k wrong track num.JPG (145.75 KB) Perhaps the files originally have some non-standard form of the tag, such as the deprecated version that grommet mentioned? Still might be nice if Foobar2000 displayed it correctly, as does Media Player, Windows Explorer, etc. At least now I know that re-writing the tags fixes the problem. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th May 2013 - 10:28 |