Lame APS nukes MPC 5 on Amnesia.wav, What the #@? |
![]() ![]() |
Lame APS nukes MPC 5 on Amnesia.wav, What the #@? |
Feb 26 2003, 22:58
Post
#51
|
|
|
Moderator Group: Super Moderator Posts: 3934 Joined: 29-September 01 Member No.: 73 |
Here are my listening tests results.
Parameters -quality5 --xlevel Amnesia Amnesia44.wav vs Amnesia44-114.mpc : ABX 8/8 Amnesia44.wav vs Amnesia44-115.mpc : ABX 8/8 Amnesia44-114.mpc vs Amnesia44-115.mpc : ABX 8/8 Amnesia48.wav vs Amnesia48-114.mpc : ABX 8/8 Amnesia48.wav vs Amnesia48-115.mpc : ABX 8/8 Amnesia48-114.mpc vs Amnesia48-115.mpc : ABX 8/8 Here's my subjective quality ranking : Amnesia44-114 : 0/5 Amnesia44-115 : 2/5 Amnesia48-114 : 4/5 Amnesia48-115 : 4.5/5 Original : 5/5 Conclusions : The 48 kHz sound better than the 44.1 kHz (no ABX) The mppenc 1.15 alpha sounds better than the 1.14 (improvement ABXed on both samples) The bad 48 kHz sounds a bit better than the good 44.1 kHz IMHO (no ABX) Transwave Transwave.wav vs Transwave-114.mpc : ABX 8/8 Transwave.wav vs Transwave-115.mpc : ABX 6/8. Again : 7/8. Total 13/16, probability I was guessing 2 % Transwave-114.mpc vs Transwave-115.mpc : ABX 4/8 Subjective ranking : Transwave-114.mpc : 4/5 Transwave-115.mpc 4.5/5 Original : 5/5 Conclusions : 1.15 alpha seems better than 1.14 again, but this sample is too weak for me to ABX the two versions of Mppenc. |
|
|
|
Feb 26 2003, 23:41
Post
#52
|
|
|
Group: Developer (Donating) Posts: 2040 Joined: 19-October 01 From: Finland Member No.: 322 |
Pio2001's transwave sample.
|
|
|
|
Mar 9 2003, 10:54
Post
#53
|
|
|
Founder Group: Admin Posts: 2958 Joined: 26-August 02 From: Nottingham, UK Member No.: 1 |
Here is a new version from Frank which may improve upon these issues some more:
QUOTE This version was greatly modified to better recognize signals which you can found in amnesia, 2nd_vent, jump, beck, awe32_20sec, angelic, ... Code is programmed, but parameters are not fine tuned very well (I had only tuned 2 days long). More information about tuning you can find in mppenc.info in the source package. When you want you can play with these parameters ... Tuning not only includes quality, but also avoiding bitrate waste. CD quality is at least at 1411,2 kbps possible which much easier means ;-) Compilability under Windows is not tested do to lack of working MS VS. Remarks are welcomed. Flames should be encapsulated by <flame> </flame>. mppenc.info win32 binaries (courtesy of Case - thanks linux binaries |
|
|
|
Mar 9 2003, 12:29
Post
#54
|
|
![]() MPC Developer Group: Developer Posts: 543 Joined: 15-December 01 From: Germany Member No.: 659 |
QUOTE (Dibrom @ Mar 9 2003 - 11:54 AM) Here is a new version from Frank which may improve upon these issues some more: QUOTE This version was greatly modified to better recognize signals which you can found in amnesia, 2nd_vent, jump, beck, awe32_20sec, angelic, ... Code is programmed, but parameters are not fine tuned very well (I had only tuned 2 days long). More information about tuning you can find in mppenc.info in the source package. When you want you can play with these parameters ... Tuning not only includes quality, but also avoiding bitrate waste. CD quality is at least at 1411,2 kbps possible which much easier means ;-) Compilability under Windows is not tested do to lack of working MS VS. Remarks are welcomed. Flames should be encapsulated by <flame> </flame>. mppenc.info win32 binaries (courtesy of Case - thanks linux binaries Note that that version is for testing, because it is a post SV7 pre SV8 bitstream version. When the results are positive I port the result back to SV7. -------------------- -- Frank Klemm
|
|
|
|
Mar 10 2003, 05:06
Post
#55
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 32 Joined: 22-February 02 Member No.: 1372 |
Here are my WinABX-results for some “problem-samples” encoded with mpcenc1.95z67 (default settings).
------------------------------------- WinABX v0.23 test report 03/10/2003 02:46:57 A file: H:\AUDIO TEST SAMPLES\mppenc1.95z67\angelic_silent_short.wav B file: H:\AUDIO TEST SAMPLES\mppenc1.95z67\angelic_silent_short.mpc.wav 02:48:12 0/1 p=100.0% etc… 03:04:59 41/64 p= 1.6% 03:05:04 test finished ------------------------------------- WinABX v0.23 test report 03/10/2003 03:06:12 A file: H:\AUDIO TEST SAMPLES\mppenc1.95z67\amnesia44khz.wav B file: H:\AUDIO TEST SAMPLES\mppenc1.95z67\amnesia44khz.mpc.wav 03:06:31 1/1 p=50.0% 03:06:45 2/2 p=25.0% 03:06:57 3/3 p=12.5% 03:07:16 4/4 p= 6.2% 03:08:13 5/5 p= 3.1% 03:08:34 6/6 p= 1.6% 03:09:22 6/7 p= 6.2% 03:09:49 7/8 p= 3.5% 03:09:55 test finished ------------------------------------- WinABX v0.23 test report 03/10/2003 03:09:57 A file: H:\AUDIO TEST SAMPLES\mppenc1.95z67nd_vent_clip.wav B file: H:\AUDIO TEST SAMPLES\mppenc1.95z67nd_vent_clip.mpc.wav 03:10:54 1/1 p=50.0% etc… 3:16:18 12/16 p= 3.8% 03:16:25 test finished ------------------------------------- WinABX v0.23 test report 03/10/2003 03:21:51 A file: H:\AUDIO TEST SAMPLES\mppenc1.95z67\Jump.wav B file: H:\AUDIO TEST SAMPLES\mppenc1.95z67\Jump.mpc.wav 03:23:06 0/1 p=100.0% etc… 03:32:01 15/21 p= 3.9% 03:32:05 test finished ------------------------------------- WinABX v0.23 test report 03/10/2003 03:36:54 A file: H:\AUDIO TEST SAMPLES\mppenc1.95z67\AE_BASSCADET.wav B file: H:\AUDIO TEST SAMPLES\mppenc1.95z67\AE_BASSCADET.mpc.wav 03:37:45 0/1 p=100.0% … 03:46:24 19/38 p=56.4% 03:46:26 test finished **** It should however be noted, although I could abx 4 out of 5 samples (not easy!), that the improvement in sound quality of the samples was impressive, compared to mppenc v1.14 and 1.15 encoded samples. I would rate them all higher than 4.6 on a scale of 5. There is however a serious problem with the blips-sample (Blips.flac) Watch this Encode log: __________ MPC Encoder 1.95z67 --Alpha-- © 1999-2002 Buschmann/Case/Klemm/Piecha encoding file 'H:\AUDIO TEST SAMPLES\mppenc1.95z67\blips.wav' to file 'H:\AUDIO TEST SAMPLES\mppenc1.95z67\blips.mpc' SV 15.15, Profile 'Standard' PCM fader : fade-in: 0.00 s, fade-out: 0.00 s, shape: 1 Scaling input by : left 1.00000, right: 1.00000 Maximum encoded bandwidth: 22.0 kHz Adaptive Noise Shaping : max. 6th order Clear Voice Detection : Dual Mid/Side Stereo : Mid/Side Stereo when superior + enhanced (2/6 dB) Threshold of Hearing : Model: min(Busch,Klemm) (5), Max ATH: 76 dB, Offset: +0 dB, +Offset@20kHz:0 dB Noise masks Tone Ratio : 6.5 dB Tone masks Noise Ratio : 18.0 dB Exploitation of temporal post masking Minimum Signal-to-Mask : 1.0 dB No deleting of input file after encoding %|avg.bitrate| speed|play time (proc/tot)| CPU time (proc/tot)| ETA 100.0 5981.6 kbps 4.21x 0:11.3 0:11.3 0:02.6 0:02.6 _______________ An average bitrate of nearly 6000kbps! But then there’s more…. Decode log: _____________ MPC Decoder 1.95z67 3DNow/SSE © 1999-2003 Buschmann/Klemm/Piecha/Wolf decoding of file 'H:\AUDIO TEST SAMPLES\mppenc1.95z67\blips.mpc.mpc' to file 'H:\AUDIO TEST SAMPLES\mppenc1.95z67\blips.mpc.wav' 5968.2 kbps, 0:11.36, SV 15.15, Profile Unstable/Experimental (--Alpha-- 1.9) 0:00.02/ 0:11.36 decoded ( 0.0%) mppdec: broken frame 66/435 (decoded size=3691, size in stream=3232) (runtime: 0.23 s speed: 7.45x) *** 1 decoded file has errors *** _____________ The encoded blips.mpc would not decode, and the decoding aborts with a broken-frame error. -tm -------------------- I can stay for hours listening to all the sounds... (Samuel Beckett, Rough for Theatre I)
|
|
|
|
Mar 10 2003, 20:18
Post
#56
|
|
|
Moderator Group: Super Moderator Posts: 3934 Joined: 29-September 01 Member No.: 73 |
Is it an effect of my imagination, or is there a treble dropout on the right channel at 10.0 s in this sample : http://perso.numericable.fr/laguill2/files...s/kovenant.flac ?
I couldn't ABX it successfully, but I was not far : Mppenc 1.15r -quality5 --xlevel : ABX 6/8 Mppenc 1.14 -quality5 --xlevel : ABX 6/8 SoundForge shows that it's clipping... It can explain the (possible) difference, but it's the first time I hear clipping as a drop out. |
|
|
|
Mar 11 2003, 10:16
Post
#57
|
|
|
WinABX developer Group: Developer Posts: 1578 Joined: 1-October 01 Member No.: 137 |
As a global, 6/8 + 6/8 = 12/16, p=3,8%... very likely there's a difference.
|
|
|
|
Mar 11 2003, 10:33
Post
#58
|
|
|
Neutrino G-RSA developer Group: Developer Posts: 852 Joined: 8-May 02 From: Geneva Member No.: 2002 |
Have you tried the new settings ( http://static.hydrogenaudio.org/extra/mppenc.info ) ?
-------------------- Try Leeloo Chat at http://leeloo.webhop.net
|
|
|
|
Mar 11 2003, 12:09
Post
#59
|
|
|
Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 302 Joined: 3-October 01 From: Finland Member No.: 188 |
QUOTE (Pio2001 @ Mar 10 2003 - 09:18 PM) Is it an effect of my imagination, or is there a treble dropout on the right channel at 10.0 s in this sample Cool, there's nothing like ABX'ing a great song like Mirror's Paradise I have that album encoded with Andree's old mppenc, using -xtreme setting. I will do a few ABX trials with a recent mppenc this evening. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 06:36 |