id3v2.3 vs id3v2.4 frame size |
id3v2.3 vs id3v2.4 frame size |
 Nov 9 2008, 22:03
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 142 Joined: 13-December 04 Member No.: 18660  |
In the specification for id3v2.4 the frame size is described as "32 bit synchsafe integer". In id3v2.3 this it not mentioned. Is there really a different?
|
 |
 
|
 |
|
Nov 10 2008, 00:05
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 142 Joined: 13-December 04 Member No.: 18660 |
There is a difference between unsynchronization in frames and synchsafe integers. It seems that id3v2.3 is using synchsafe integers for the tag size but not for the frame size. Can anyone confirm this?
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 11 2008, 21:21
Post
#3
|
|
 Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 391 Joined: 2-March 04 Member No.: 12414 |
QUOTE (stigc @ Nov 9 2008, 23:05)  There is a difference between unsynchronization in frames and synchsafe integers. It seems that id3v2.3 is using synchsafe integers for the tag size but not for the frame size. Can anyone confirm this? True. |
|
|
|
stigc id3v2.3 vs id3v2.4 frame size Nov 9 2008, 22:03
stigc i guess it is so, but i find it strange since the ... Nov 9 2008, 22:20 Sebastian Mares There is a difference since unsynchronization is o... Nov 9 2008, 23:05 robert Looks like unsynchronization is an ID3v2.3 feature... Nov 9 2008, 23:43 robert No, read 1st link above. Nov 10 2008, 00:09 stigc Funny to have unsynchronization mechanism and then... Nov 11 2008, 22:05 robert ID3v2 tag header size is always unsynchronized. Nov 11 2008, 22:22 stigc Yes, but not the frame size bytes.
Does anyone ha... Nov 11 2008, 22:33 Paul Sanders Well, what a mess this all is! I have just tr... Nov 30 2008, 00:07 Jebus Unsynchronization can only be applied to the entir... Nov 30 2008, 01:02
stigc Thanks for your response. Nov 30 2008, 17:44 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 09:52 |
