IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
A way to prevent bitrate modes
jojolapin
post Jan 12 2002, 21:42
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 24
Joined: 2-January 02
From: Paris
Member No.: 884



Hiya !
I have noticed that a big number of ogg newbies are trying to encode their tracks using bitrates instead of quality modes.
I know that bitrates modes are needed for streaming, but we should think about a way to prevent newbies to use these mode, or we will soon have many "bad" ogg encoded tracks flying around or people saying that vorbis is not good.

A few ideas :
- asking something like "are you sure you want to specify a bitrate, which will lead to bad quality ?" But the problem is that it will do nothing with frontends.
- Taking these modes out of the normal builds, and distributing special builds intended for streaming.
- Taking it out of the documentation and of the command line help? But there will always be the problem of the frontends.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Garf
post Jan 12 2002, 22:59
Post #2


Server Admin


Group: Admin
Posts: 4853
Joined: 24-September 01
Member No.: 13



Give me a moron-proof tool, and I will find you a better moron.

Edit: In case it wasn't clear, I just mean that no matter what you do, people will still try to use bitrates.

--
GCP
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Neo Neko
post Jan 13 2002, 04:33
Post #3





Group: Banned
Posts: 386
Joined: 5-December 01
Member No.: 589



I have only recently gotten into using the quality modes myself. 4 and 5 are quite spiffy. It takes quite a bit of adjustment after nine to ten years of setting the bitrate.

I am desperatly trying to get a sucessful compile of Icecast2 going right now though. After 3 years of dooing internet MP3 radio all this recent enforcement of MP3 licensing had got me down on the whole format. I just decided to scrap the stream till something better came along. Enter Vorbis. Once Icecast2 and the bit stripper are out it will be bliss. I can keep my high quality versions on the system and still use them to stream a medium bandwidth stream with a small amount of CPU power. I guess getting my mail server up should be more of a priority though. rolleyes.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tangent
post Jan 13 2002, 06:21
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 674
Joined: 29-September 01
Member No.: 63



Some of us are trying to work out a better design for oggdrop to deal with that... but as Garf said, they won't be able to beat the super-morons

http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/showth...s=&threadid=757
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
AgentMil
post Jan 13 2002, 06:31
Post #5





Group: Members (Donating)
Posts: 584
Joined: 19-December 01
From: Australia
Member No.: 688



LOL, Is there ever such a thing as a SUPER MORON?? I've known a few morons in my life, but never a super moron biggrin.gif.

Yeah its like the morons who think stereo implementation is better than the JS in LAME. Also those who think 128KBps MP3 IS CD quality. And those who think 98KBps WMA IS CD quality.


--------------------
-=MusePack... Living Audio Compression=-

Honda - The Power of Dreams
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rjamorim
post Jan 13 2002, 10:26
Post #6


Rarewares admin


Group: Members
Posts: 7515
Joined: 30-September 01
From: Brazil
Member No.: 81



LOL... some believe WMA 64kbps is CD quality, just because "Bill Gates says so".


--------------------
Get up-to-date binaries of Lame, AAC, Vorbis and much more at RareWares:
http://www.rarewares.org
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th April 2014 - 17:46