About ReplayGain standard |
About ReplayGain standard |
Apr 12 2009, 11:20
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 32 Joined: 2-January 09 Member No.: 65095 |
Hi! I'm new here. I'm sorry if this is posted in the wrong place, I'd appreciate your help!
Please read this first: I made a suggestion, which I think will improve the current Replay Gain standard. But my strongest point was proven invalid. Other benefits, though existent, may not be worth the hassles of changing an already popular standard. So I guess we'll just leave it as it is Thanks for the discussion. I think RG standard should be changed, so that it stores the actual level of the track, rather than the "gain". Here are my points: 1. Standards should not feel awkward, and the current standard feels very awkward. Don't get me wrong, it works perfectly. But where did that 89dB "reference level" come from? Based on what was it decided? Besides, I'd rather see how loud my track/album is, instead of looking at some (less meaningful) negative numbers. Not valid. 3. This is the most important. This change will not break any compatibility! All we have to do is add 2 new tag fields: REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_LEVEL and REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_LEVEL. They can be easily calculated from the 2 old "GAIN" fields (assuming the 89dB reference was used). New players will use these new fields and just ignore the old ones, while old players remain compatible. And the "Pre-amp" option will be changed to "Preferred Level", which defaults to 89dB. Makes much more sense to me! 4. It's not too late. Replay Gain is getting more and more attention. My Sansa Fuze has just got RG support via a firmware update, and I'm extremely happy with that. Before RG is widely used or even becomes an official standard, we should improve it as far as we can! These are only my ideas. I don't know what else to do but post it here Thank you. This post has been edited by waaateva: Apr 13 2009, 12:19 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Apr 12 2009, 14:03
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 65 Joined: 13-September 07 Member No.: 47005 |
The gain numbers are meaningful. They show how much the track/album must be adjusted to match -20dBFS pink noise. Thus, if the gain is -5dB, the average volume is -15dBFS.
The reference level affects just loudness contour that is used to calculate the average power. For example, 89dB means that if you listen at that SPL level the perceived power levels match. -------------------- Teemu
|
|
|
|
Apr 12 2009, 15:27
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 32 Joined: 2-January 09 Member No.: 65095 |
The reference level affects just loudness contour that is used to calculate the average power. Does that mean if the reference level is changed, the "volume level" calculated by RG will change accordingly? This post has been edited by waaateva: Apr 13 2009, 12:22 |
|
|
|
waaateva About ReplayGain standard Apr 12 2009, 11:20
tot QUOTE (waaateva @ Apr 12 2009, 16:27) QUO... Apr 12 2009, 16:12
waaateva I'm sorry but I have no idea what you're t... Apr 12 2009, 16:54
tot QUOTE (waaateva @ Apr 12 2009, 17:54) I s... Apr 12 2009, 17:29
skamp QUOTE (waaateva @ Apr 12 2009, 17:54) REP... Apr 12 2009, 17:42
waaateva QUOTE (skamp @ Apr 12 2009, 23:42) QUOTE ... Apr 12 2009, 17:49
tot QUOTE (waaateva @ Apr 12 2009, 18:49) Me ... Apr 12 2009, 18:05
waaateva QUOTE (tot @ Apr 13 2009, 00:05) QUOTE (w... Apr 12 2009, 18:10
tot QUOTE (waaateva @ Apr 12 2009, 19:10) OK,... Apr 12 2009, 20:00
lvqcl QUOTE Besides, I'd rather see how loud my trac... Apr 12 2009, 17:15
waaateva QUOTE (lvqcl @ Apr 12 2009, 23:15) Audio ... Apr 12 2009, 17:44
lvqcl QUOTE (waaateva @ Apr 12 2009, 20:44) Of ... Apr 12 2009, 17:49
waaateva Agreed. And my suggestion is to tweak the standard... Apr 12 2009, 18:01
Canar QUOTE (waaateva @ Apr 12 2009, 10:01) Agr... Apr 12 2009, 18:57
greynol Coming from someone who uses 92 dB for a target vo... Apr 12 2009, 19:07
waaateva QUOTE (greynol @ Apr 13 2009, 01:07) Comi... Apr 13 2009, 04:08
Mike Giacomelli QUOTE (waaateva @ Apr 12 2009, 23:08) QUO... Apr 13 2009, 04:16

waaateva QUOTE (Mike Giacomelli @ Apr 13 2009, 10... Apr 13 2009, 04:32

greynol QUOTE (waaateva @ Apr 12 2009, 20:32) You... Apr 13 2009, 07:21


waaateva Guys,
You were right, I was wrong about MP3Gain an... Apr 13 2009, 10:57


Lear QUOTE (waaateva @ Apr 13 2009, 10:57) Now... Apr 13 2009, 13:25


waaateva Thanks for the links, they are very helpful. This ... Apr 13 2009, 15:12


tot QUOTE (Lear @ Apr 13 2009, 14:25) Because... Apr 13 2009, 15:28

greynol QUOTE (waaateva @ Apr 12 2009, 20:32) So,... Apr 13 2009, 07:24
David Nordin QUOTE (waaateva @ Apr 13 2009, 05:08) Act... Apr 13 2009, 08:33
timcupery I like the suggestion, although I don't think ... Apr 12 2009, 19:13
WonderSlug Wouldn't it just be easier to assume that sinc... Apr 12 2009, 19:27
greynol There's already a tag for this:
REPLAYGAIN_REF... Apr 12 2009, 19:31
Mike Giacomelli This seems pointless. Apr 13 2009, 01:38
Big_Berny IMHO it makes sense what waaateva means. And AFAIK... Apr 13 2009, 02:35
[JAZ] I also believe waaateva got confused.
I've ch... Apr 13 2009, 10:33
2Bdecided I didn't see this thread at the time, and I ce... Sep 3 2010, 10:41![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 23:45 |