Best quality resampling method?, sox, r8brain, libsamplerate, ssrc |
Best quality resampling method?, sox, r8brain, libsamplerate, ssrc |
May 23 2009, 16:35
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 166 Joined: 28-September 06 Member No.: 35705 |
SoX Resampler (VHQ)
r8brain (Pro) SSRC (HP) tuned by EAC3TO SSRC (HP) Secret Rabbit Code (libsamplerate) tuned by ReClock Secret Rabbit Code (libsamplerate) Wich of this resamplers have you tried, what you can reccomend? I need it mostly for NTSC/PAL (4% slowdown/speedup) conversions. I have found this page (wich have most of this methods listed), but still not sure what will the best for movies (48 kHz, AC3 artefacts). This post has been edited by ZinCh: May 23 2009, 16:39 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Dec 10 2012, 02:29
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 469 Joined: 5-June 11 Member No.: 91257 |
Don't use resamplers often, but curious to know some things...
Let's say you want to downsample a 24-bit/96kHz file to 16-bit/44kHz, When using SoX plugin with foobar2000 to do the conversion, SoX plugin does not have any dither settings so you cannot also apply dither ...is this correct? When using SoX from the command line you can resample AND apply dither if you want ...is this correct? Considering that the thread topic is Best quality resampling method, what is the best way of applying dither using SoX (as plugin and as standalone)? I get asked questions like "SoX is a great resampler but I also want it to apply great dither, how?" all the time (because I happen to use foobar2000 a lot), but I can't give authoritative answers. This post has been edited by derty2: Dec 10 2012, 02:38 |
|
|
|
Dec 10 2012, 03:00
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 4132 Joined: 2-September 02 Member No.: 3264 |
Considering that the thread topic is Best quality resampling method, what is the best way of applying dither using SoX (as plugin and as standalone)? Changing the bits/sample isn't resampling I get asked questions like "SoX is a great resampler but I also want it to apply great dither, how?" all the time (because I happen to use foobar2000 a lot), but I can't give authoritative answers. Why not just use the (very good) built in foobar2000 dither? Any quality dither should give you transparent results if the output is at least 16 bit. |
|
|
|
ZinCh Best quality resampling method? May 23 2009, 16:35
lvqcl SSRC doesn't support arbitrary input/output sa... May 23 2009, 19:12
ZinCh OK, we can exclude different "versions",... May 23 2009, 19:45
lvqcl 1. I wrote «So I doubt you can do "4% slowdow... May 23 2009, 20:40
ZinCh eac3to changelog:
v2.76
* SSRC resampling paramet... May 23 2009, 22:01
Canar I use and prefer SoX, as per the analyses at http:... May 23 2009, 22:43
Ron Jones QUOTE (Canar @ May 23 2009, 14:43) I use ... May 24 2009, 03:04
Kees de Visser QUOTE (Ron Jones @ May 24 2009, 04:04) QU... May 24 2009, 12:38
Ron Jones QUOTE (Kees de Visser @ May 24 2009, 04:3... May 29 2009, 18:50
Canar QUOTE (Kees de Visser @ May 24 2009, 04:3... May 29 2009, 19:34
lvqcl There's also foobar2000 plugin "SSRC X... May 24 2009, 00:07
lvqcl I tried to ABX SoX and libsamplerate... unsuccessf... May 24 2009, 12:08
ZinCh Anyone know what resampler use LAME? I have tried ... May 29 2009, 18:36
lvqcl QUOTE (ZinCh @ May 29 2009, 21:36) Anyone... May 29 2009, 20:04
ZinCh QUOTE (lvqcl @ May 29 2009, 23:04) QUOTE ... Jun 9 2009, 12:51
anddele QUOTE I have found this page (wich have most of th... May 29 2009, 19:18
IgorC Pretty old topic but still.
Apparently there is a... Mar 16 2012, 03:59
Wombat All resamplers more or less fight with the same li... Mar 16 2012, 04:54
Ron Jones I tend to agree with Wombat. Even if you're lo... Mar 16 2012, 06:16
markanini Any improvement or dis-improvement compared to Sox... Mar 16 2012, 11:07
Polarus Sorry for re-activating old topic, but this site s... Dec 9 2012, 18:05
chi QUOTE (Polarus @ Dec 9 2012, 19:05) Sorry... Dec 10 2012, 01:57![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 01:19 |