IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
LAME -q option?
Lucien
post May 31 2009, 19:19
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 31-May 09
Member No.: 70287



I've just downloaded LAME v3.98.2, previously I used to use v3.97 with the switches

CODE
-V 0 -q 0 --vbr-new


This being a new version I've got, I checked the wiki for recommended settings. One thing I'm not sure on is whether the -q option is still used. There's nothing about it on the wiki (and the forum search didn't allow a two character search term), though it's still listed when doing --longhelp.

So my questions is, does this setting have any effect any more? Is there a "recommended" option for this or would it be left to personal choice? Speed is not an issue - with v3.97 it was still plenty fast enough for me.

Thanks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
halb27
post May 31 2009, 19:29
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 1744
Joined: 9-October 05
From: Dormagen, Germany
Member No.: 25015



Use just -V0.
--vbr-new is defaulted with 3.98, and AFAIK -q 0 is mapped internally to exactly what's used when there is no -q switch.


--------------------
lossyWAV -P --altpreset | FLAC -8 (350 kbps)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lucien
post May 31 2009, 19:44
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 31-May 09
Member No.: 70287



Thanks, I should have mentioned that I already noted dropping the --vbr-new from the wiki.

However the --longhelp switch brings up this info:

CODE
Noise shaping & psycho acoustic algorithms:
  -q <arg>        <arg> = 0...9.  Default  -q 5
                  -q 0:  Highest quality, very slow
                  -q 9:  Poor quality, but fast
  -h              Same as -q 2.   Recommended.
  -f              Same as -q 7.   Fast, ok quality


Which indicates that -q 5 is the default, not 0.

I would assume then from that info and your reply that the -q switch still has an effect smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lvqcl
post May 31 2009, 20:15
Post #4





Group: Developer
Posts: 821
Joined: 2-December 07
Member No.: 49183



I just tried LAME 3.98.2: for CBR, ABR and vbr-old default q value is 3. For vbr-new, it's 0.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
marcusm
post May 31 2009, 21:17
Post #5





Group: Members
Posts: 82
Joined: 11-March 09
From: MA, USA
Member No.: 67856



Try this: -V2 -q0 --lowpass 19.7
and see if you can make a better sounding mp3. I can make a bigger one but, I have yet to make a better sounding one.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lucien
post Jun 1 2009, 20:57
Post #6





Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 31-May 09
Member No.: 70287



I'll give that a try and see how it sounds... What do the options mean though? V2 quality but push the passband up to 19.7 kHz? What would be the upper limit for that?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kornchild2002
post Jun 1 2009, 21:22
Post #7





Group: Members
Posts: 1646
Joined: 8-April 05
Member No.: 21277



Personally, I wouldn't use that command line. -q0 is redundant and the lowpass filter is automatically set at 18671 Hz - 19205 Hz when using -V 2. A lowpass setting of 19.7KHz is larger than the default. It is normally not recommended to increase the lowpass filter setting. If you are going to do anything to the lowpass setting, add the -Y option. I have conducted only a handful of ABX tests in which the lowpass filter setting was increased beyond what Lame normally uses, the results were not optimal.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st November 2009 - 21:52