Why checksum uncompressed audio? |
Why checksum uncompressed audio? |
Oct 25 2009, 08:06
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 231 Joined: 6-April 09 Member No.: 68706 |
FLAC and Wavpack (likely others too) use error detection codes for uncompressed audio data.
Why not for compressed? I could find only 2 differences: -you have to decompress the data to verify correctness, which (sometimes greatly) reduces verification performance -you have more data to be checksumed, which slightly reduces compression / verification performance What am I missing? |
|
|
|
![]() |
Oct 25 2009, 22:28
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 2296 Joined: 18-May 03 From: Denmark Member No.: 6695 |
What is your goal? You don't need to decode and verify your files every now and then. If you ask me both a checksum of encoded and decoded audio is somewhat useless if you have no reference. AccurateRip is a large database that provides the ability to verify CD-rips using checksums. With CUEtools you can even store verification results to tags.
-------------------- Can't wait for a HD-AAC encoder :P
|
|
|
|
_mē_ Why checksum uncompressed audio? Oct 25 2009, 08:06
stigc The checksum is meant to proof that the decoded da... Oct 25 2009, 09:12
_mē_ QUOTE (stigc @ Oct 25 2009, 09:12) The ch... Oct 25 2009, 16:53
kjoonlee FLAC does store the checksum of the whole audio da... Oct 25 2009, 18:05
Bylie WavPack by default uses blockbased CRC's and, ... Oct 25 2009, 19:18
_mē_ OK, now I get it.
I didn't know that there are... Oct 25 2009, 21:35
_mē_ Silent data corruption.
I verify my music collecti... Oct 26 2009, 14:54
rpp3po Verification time should be disk-bound. I don... Oct 26 2009, 15:15
_mē_ If it was disk bound, FLAC and WavPack would have ... Oct 26 2009, 17:17
rpp3po Just checked an old comparison. Wavpack 4 really o... Oct 26 2009, 17:48![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 11:55 |