Numark TTUSB tonearm adjustment |
Numark TTUSB tonearm adjustment |
Dec 11 2009, 22:03
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 28 Joined: 11-December 09 Member No.: 75846 |
I have first browsed the wiki for this, though only a few minutes. My question is about adjusting the tone arm on the Numark TTUSB. Can anybody tell me where there are instructions on adjusting the counterweight on the tone arm of the Numark TTUSB and adjusting the anti-skate mechanism?
I got the turntable yesterday. The instructions in the operator's manual is insufficient, with only a few sentences on the subject that seem very ambiguous to me. The manual says, QUOTE ...there should be a feeling of weight and resistance when the head shell is raised and lowered. Begin rotating the counterweight clockwise (away from the pivot point) until the weight and resistance feeling is gone. If done properly, the tone arm will pivot with very little resistance back and forth indicating that there is exactly 0 grams of stylus pressure. With the counterweight in its new position further away from tone arm pivot point, grasp the scale ring of the counter weight and rotate it until "0" is in the vertical position. Finally, rotate the counterweight (and scale ring) counter-clockwise (towards the pivot point) until the desired amount of weight is reached. If the scale rotates 360 degrees beyond the zero point, the new scale ring reading should be added to 3.5. I don't understand these instructions at all. I remember seeing somewhere last month, when shopping for this, mention of some website or other with instructions on adjusting the tonearm and antiskate functions. Thank you, in advance, for your attention on this subject. Don This post has been edited by greynol: Dec 11 2009, 22:04
Reason for edit: Please use the default font. Placed quote in the proper container.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Dec 14 2009, 00:11
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 3080 Joined: 1-September 05 From: SE Pennsylvania Member No.: 24233 |
As the record turns, the needle dragging in the groove produces a force due to frictiion. Because the tone arm is at an angle with respect to the groove, part of this force is exerted as a sideways force, or skating force. This force tries to draw the needle toward the center of the record. If there were no anti-skating correction then this would cause the needle to press harder against one side of the groove than the other.
Since the frictional force is proportional to the tracking force (the downward force of the needle against the record) the skating force is also proportional to this, which is why the skating force needs to be adjusted with the tracking force. |
|
|
|
Dec 14 2009, 09:49
Post
#3
|
|
|
WaveRepair developer Group: Developer Posts: 774 Joined: 28-July 04 Member No.: 15845 |
As the record turns, the needle dragging in the groove produces a force due to frictiion. Because the tone arm is at an angle with respect to the groove, part of this force is exerted as a sideways force, or skating force. This force tries to draw the needle toward the center of the record. If there were no anti-skating correction then this would cause the needle to press harder against one side of the groove than the other. Actually the stylus should not be at an angle with respect to the groove. (Of course on a pivoted tonearm, most of the time it is *slightly* out of alignment). The source of the sideways force is due to the overhang. A pickup arm with zero overhang doesn't generate any sideways force. So, you may ask, why have an overhang? Because it improves the geometric alignment of stylus to groove over a wider portion of the LP side. This benefit outweighs the downside of needing to add antiskate. (Ever noticed that linear tracking tonearms have no overhang?) The best way to set antiskating is to start at or slightly above the tracking force, then adjust by ear. As Axon says, it's very difficult to get it right for every LP, so don't stress too much about this. |
|
|
|
rocket_pc Numark TTUSB tonearm adjustment Dec 11 2009, 22:03
DVDdoug I don't have that turntable, but the instructi... Dec 11 2009, 22:47
rocket_pc Thank you for the reply, DVDdoug. I didn't se... Dec 12 2009, 23:12
rocket_pc Thinking about this, once again, adjusting the ton... Dec 13 2009, 05:30
MichaelW QUOTE (rocket_pc @ Dec 13 2009, 16:30) Th... Dec 13 2009, 06:47
rocket_pc Thanks for the reply, Michael. Okay, now I unders... Dec 13 2009, 21:24
MichaelW I can't give a reasonable explanation of anti-... Dec 13 2009, 21:28
rocket_pc Thank you for your replies. Michael, the google s... Dec 14 2009, 01:47
Axon Antiskate is complicated, and different instructio... Dec 14 2009, 04:19
Axon Adjusting by ear means adjusting both the tracking... Dec 14 2009, 11:40
rocket_pc I could just "adjust by ear" - listen to... Dec 14 2009, 19:47
cliveb QUOTE (rocket_pc @ Dec 14 2009, 18:47) I ... Dec 15 2009, 09:43
rocket_pc Thank you for your reply, cliveb. I hope you unde... Jan 10 2010, 08:59
cliveb QUOTE (rocket_pc @ Jan 10 2010, 07:59) An... Jan 10 2010, 10:52
rocket_pc QUOTE The force that draws the stylus towards the ... Jan 10 2010, 12:26
cliveb QUOTE (rocket_pc @ Jan 10 2010, 11:26) cl... Jan 10 2010, 15:08
rocket_pc QUOTE However, I don't believe HFS75 is availa... Jan 10 2010, 16:41
rocket_pc Hi cliveb, Thank you for your reply. I've go... Jan 12 2010, 06:18
cliveb QUOTE (rocket_pc @ Jan 12 2010, 05:18) I ... Jan 12 2010, 09:34
Arnold B. Krueger QUOTE (rocket_pc @ Jan 12 2010, 00:18) I ... Jan 12 2010, 14:09
rocket_pc There shouldn't be too much wear from testing,... Jan 13 2010, 00:30
cliveb QUOTE (rocket_pc @ Jan 12 2010, 23:30) Th... Jan 13 2010, 10:49
Axon The Ultimate Test LP is also worth looking at, and... Jan 13 2010, 00:31
rocket_pc Hi audiophiles, Thank you for your replies, Clive... Jan 21 2010, 06:39
Knowzy QUOTE (cliveb @ Jan 12 2010, 01:34) You... Jan 21 2010, 21:19
cliveb QUOTE (Knowzy @ Jan 21 2010, 20:19) A bet... Jan 22 2010, 13:27
paulhyland QUOTE (cliveb @ Jan 22 2010, 07:27) QUOTE... Feb 14 2012, 20:30
Arnold B. Krueger QUOTE (paulhyland @ Feb 14 2012, 14:30) Q... Feb 15 2012, 14:41
rocket_pc Hi Knowsy, I believe that you're the guy whom... Jan 22 2010, 02:16
Knowzy QUOTE (rocket_pc @ Jan 21 2010, 18:16) Hi... Jan 22 2010, 06:27
Knowzy QUOTE (cliveb @ Jan 22 2010, 05:27) I res... Jan 22 2010, 19:06
rocket_pc Thank you very much for your replies. What I thin... Jan 23 2010, 05:23
Knowzy QUOTE (rocket_pc @ Jan 22 2010, 20:23) Wh... Jan 23 2010, 22:09
rocket_pc Okay, I won't get that. How can they they eve... Jan 23 2010, 23:14
Knowzy QUOTE (rocket_pc @ Jan 23 2010, 14:14) Ho... Jan 23 2010, 23:28
arranzio Hi Rocket
I just arrived here googleing, looking ... Jan 29 2010, 12:59
Knowzy Hi Albert,
Welcome to HA.
That is a lot to diges... Jan 30 2010, 02:05
arranzio Thanks for your comments, Jeff.
Yes pretty long, ... Jan 30 2010, 02:34
rocket_pc Hi all,
I aggree that this Numark is a lousy turn... Jan 30 2010, 18:15
cliveb QUOTE (rocket_pc @ Jan 30 2010, 17:15) Th... Jan 31 2010, 10:54
rocket_pc Hi cliveb,
I wouldn't conclude that this Num... Jan 31 2010, 12:05
cliveb QUOTE (rocket_pc @ Jan 31 2010, 11:05) I ... Feb 1 2010, 10:39
Knowzy QUOTE (rocket_pc @ Jan 30 2010, 09:15) Th... Feb 1 2010, 20:40
rocket_pc Thank you for your replies. I've got a couple... Feb 2 2010, 06:23
rocket_pc My digital camera is malfunctioning. Reading from... Feb 3 2010, 01:34
Knowzy QUOTE (rocket_pc @ Feb 2 2010, 16:34) Rea... Feb 3 2010, 06:37
cliveb QUOTE (Knowzy @ Feb 3 2010, 05:37) I... Feb 3 2010, 10:01
rocket_pc Thank you for your replies. Jotted down the info ... Feb 3 2010, 17:29
Knowzy QUOTE (rocket_pc @ Feb 3 2010, 08:29) Hav... Feb 3 2010, 23:08
rocket_pc Hi all, I'm back, for a moment.
Up front, t... Feb 10 2010, 10:48
rocket_pc PS:
The Shure cartridge that you mentioned in thi... Feb 10 2010, 10:56
cliveb QUOTE (rocket_pc @ Feb 10 2010, 09:48) Ca... Feb 11 2010, 19:21
Knowzy QUOTE (rocket_pc @ Feb 10 2010, 01:48) Th... Feb 11 2010, 07:50
rocket_pc Thank you for your reply, cliveb and knowsy, It w... Feb 11 2010, 23:09![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 09:36 |