XMPlay 3.5 |
  |
XMPlay 3.5 |
 Dec 22 2009, 18:19
Post
#1
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 121 Joined: 6-July 03 From: Finland Member No.: 7590  |
Lightweight Windows music player, finally ready with a whole sleighful of changes
 Some of the more notable ones include: * Built-in AIFF support * Crossfading * Track rating * Configurable SRC quality * More flexible search system (present/absent directives) * Quick find shortcut Un4seen.com Direct link: XMPlay 3.5 This post has been edited by Pike84: Dec 22 2009, 18:56 -------------------- XMPlay rocks! www.un4seen.com
|
 |
 
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 20:42
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 153 Joined: 6-April 02 Member No.: 1707 |
A seriously under-appreciated piece of software. Thanks for the heads-up.
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 17 2010, 06:56
Post
#3
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 49 Joined: 26-March 03 From: Phoenix, AZ Member No.: 5688 |
QUOTE (Compact Dick @ Dec 23 2009, 12:42)  A seriously under-appreciated piece of software. Thanks for the heads-up. Agreed. Freakin amazing prog - Pieknyman's SID plugin really makes it. *8-)DRS -------------------- Dean-Ryan Stone
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 17 2010, 15:05
Post
#4
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 1540 Joined: 13-August 03 Member No.: 8353 |
I wish there was a Windows Mobile version of XMPlay...
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 17 2010, 18:53
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 34 Joined: 17-September 08 From: Iceland Member No.: 58352 |
I've been a happy XMPlay user for years now. A fantastic program.
But it is not too friendly with wavpack and tak, which is unfortunate. At least I am unable to edit wavpack tags, and the TAK encoder is not working while other encoders like lame 3.98.2 and oggenc2 work just fine. (The files decode, but as soon as XMPlay calls takc to encode the result, the processing simply stops without any errors). |
|
|
|
|
Jan 18 2010, 19:50
Post
#6
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 512 Joined: 18-January 04 From: bethlehem.pa.us Member No.: 11318 |
XMPlay is great for playback (and is the most compact audio player I know for its feature set), but it's notoriously bad for tag editing, as it relies on the playback plugin to provide this feature. Its own internal library system is better suited for this, if you intend on using this program for your primary player.
This post has been edited by Zarggg: Jan 18 2010, 19:50 |
|
|
|
|
Feb 26 2010, 06:22
Post
#7
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 27 Joined: 11-September 09 From: NL Member No.: 73078 |
In the meantime there's 3.5.1
I keep track of the latest stable version and some plugins here I don't care much about bad tag editing, I have other apps for that. It's a player, no need for a swiss knife. -------------------- 0.618033988
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 26 2010, 18:59
Post
#8
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 3620 Joined: 14-May 03 From: Bad Herrenalb Member No.: 6613 |
Better use http://www.un4seen.com/rss.xml to keep track of updates.
-------------------- http://listening-tests.hydrogenaudio.org/sebastian/
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 22 2010, 09:35
Post
#9
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 23 Joined: 22-April 10 Member No.: 80062 |
22April2010
Greetings. My feedback regarding XMPlay is that XMPlay is not "lightweight" as CoolPlayer & foobar are "lightweight". I still have my original laptop/PC from 1998 - a Toshiba 4005cds with a 233mHz PII maxed out at 160mb RAM. I also have two much more modern XP laptops ... Anyway, I use the 4005 to play audio & video files while I do stuff / work on the other two laptops. The 4005 can run CoolPlayer & foobar without maxing out & locking up at 100% CPU usage, but XMPlay (as do most A/V freeware apps) sends 4005 CPU usage to 100%. I realize most people don't evaluate XMPlay in the context of such a dinosaur laptop, but nonetheless ... there is my feedback ... The 4005 can run VLC, SMPlayer, CoolPlayer, WinAmp, foobar, JetAudio (when properly tweaked) & (together with) SpecLab at about 50% CPU usage. Thank you. Regards, AEN Æ |
|
|
|
|
Apr 22 2010, 13:12
Post
#10
|
|
 Group: Super Moderator Posts: 3268 Joined: 26-July 02 From: princegeorge.ca Member No.: 2796 |
Note that XMPlay is not foobar2000 or any of the other players listed and has different design philosophies. If you have a problem with the CPU usage, I suggest you take it up with the developer in a more official forum. This is just a news post because there are users here who use it. It is a great player indeed!
-------------------- (atrix|(fb2k->e-mu 0404 usb|audio 8 dj))->hd280|jvc ha-fx35-b
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 11:40 |
