Do Not Use the Vorbis FFMPEG enecoder if you building WebM!, Monty mentions this in his blog post, but nobody is listening! |
Do Not Use the Vorbis FFMPEG enecoder if you building WebM!, Monty mentions this in his blog post, but nobody is listening! |
Jun 12 2010, 18:37
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1593 Joined: 24-March 02 From: Revere, MA Member No.: 1607 |
A lot of open-source enthusiasts and advocates are very excited about Google latest announcement of VP8 / Vorbis combo in a new container called WebM. The entire HTML 5 enthusiasts are so excited that they went a ahead a little to prematurely are building suboptimal builds! Michael Niedermeyer of FFMPEG projects acknowledges that the FFMPEG Vorbis encoder is buggy! Monty has a work around on his blog if you plan on building the WebM encoder under Linux. I am also providing an explanation in the wiki as to why it's generally a good idea to use the mainline libvorbis with libavcodec instead due to the fact that is has 5.1 channel coupling implemented correctly! Please spread the word as this will turn into a disaster sooner or later before it's patched. If you thought the HTML 5 wars are not bad enough now!
Monty's Blog: http://xiphmont.livejournal.com/51160.html This post has been edited by HotshotGG: Jun 12 2010, 18:43 -------------------- College student/IT Assistant
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Jun 14 2010, 01:13
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Developer Posts: 191 Joined: 8-July 03 Member No.: 7653 |
TOS #8!!!
|
|
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 17:09
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 512 Joined: 18-January 04 From: bethlehem.pa.us Member No.: 11318 |
|
|
|
|
Jun 14 2010, 17:48
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Group: Developer Posts: 191 Joined: 8-July 03 Member No.: 7653 |
TOS #8!!! How is it TOS8 if the user is just passing on word that ffmpeg is acknowledging a known bug in their encoder? Do we need to ABX for programming errors now? Sarcasm aside, Kohlrabi does make a good point. It's not buggy in that sense. It's not like it crashes. The claim is that it produces significantly poor quality. Squarely within the sights of TOS8. There are some people who do not believe these claims, or at least think they are exaggerated. The largest and most visible user of WEBM is using ffvorbis. It would be useful to have an independent (from the developers of libvorbis) validation of the perceptual performance... since the "well known suggestion to use libvorbis" is not that well known. |
|
|
|
Jun 15 2010, 05:57
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 512 Joined: 18-January 04 From: bethlehem.pa.us Member No.: 11318 |
|
|
|
|
HotshotGG Do Not Use the Vorbis FFMPEG enecoder if you building WebM! Jun 12 2010, 18:37
NullC QUOTE (Zarggg @ Jun 14 2010, 21:57) QUOTE... Jun 19 2010, 00:39
saratoga QUOTE (NullC @ Jun 18 2010, 19:39) Many t... Jun 19 2010, 01:14
NullC QUOTE (saratoga @ Jun 18 2010, 16:14) QUO... Jun 19 2010, 03:06
Kohlrabi I don't get the point of this post, ffmpeg-peo... Jun 14 2010, 08:54
saratoga I don't think you have to validate something t... Jun 14 2010, 18:39
LordWarlock QUOTE (NullC @ Jun 14 2010, 18:48) It wou... Jun 14 2010, 18:41
NullC QUOTE (LordWarlock @ Jun 14 2010, 10:41) ... Jun 14 2010, 19:21
saratoga QUOTE (NullC @ Jun 14 2010, 14:21) QUOTE ... Jun 14 2010, 20:45
Canar Canar reporting in with an ABX. A blind monkey cou... Jun 14 2010, 20:16
lvqcl What is worse: FFMPEG Vorbis, FFMPEG WMA or FFMPEG... Jun 14 2010, 20:57
Canar QUOTE (lvqcl @ Jun 14 2010, 14:57) What i... Jun 14 2010, 21:11
HotshotGG QUOTE The problem is that people do not realize th... Jun 15 2010, 05:52
dutch109 This problem has already been raised here when the... Jun 15 2010, 14:23
Kohlrabi You can generate your own citation:
Go to #ffmpeg... Jun 19 2010, 12:09
Oded Shimon A bit late here, for what it's worth, here is ... Jul 20 2010, 16:03![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th May 2013 - 17:54 |