FLAC & WMAL (need some input) |
FLAC & WMAL (need some input) |
 Sep 28 2010, 01:06
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 28-September 10 Member No.: 84175  |
Hey fellow audiophiles. I just want to know if I should go through with converting 390 albums in WMAL to FLAC. I'm thinking of switching to Foobar because I don't have a Zune anymore and the Zune software takes up a good amount of resources. OR should I just stay as is and convert any new audio to WMAL forever? Need some input please.
|
 |
 
|
 |
|
Sep 29 2010, 15:27
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 88 Joined: 25-March 09 Member No.: 68370 |
If I were doing it, I'd keep the 390 albums as they are, unless the need arises ( i.e. iPod purchase, in which case I'd convert to ALAC, lossy aac/m4a, or mp3..Now for future rips, I would rip to flac..
Jm2cents.. 
|
|
|
|
Koffee FLAC & WMAL (need some input) Sep 28 2010, 01:06
SCOTU Is there a problem just using your existing WMALs ... Sep 28 2010, 01:28 Koffee I'm kind of an OCD freak and would want an all... Sep 28 2010, 03:04 Engelsstaub There's nothing "wrong" with WMA Los... Sep 28 2010, 07:55 odyssey As an entire offtopic recommendation, but to suple... Sep 29 2010, 16:40 DragonQ WMAL actually gives better compression ratios than... Oct 1 2010, 12:35
HTS QUOTE (DragonQ @ Oct 1 2010, 06:35) WMAL ... Jan 13 2012, 05:24 Porcus QUOTE (HTS @ Jan 13 2012, 05:24) Hasn... Jan 13 2012, 09:00 lvqcl QUOTE (HTS @ Jan 13 2012, 08:24) But righ... Jan 13 2012, 16:08 HTS QUOTE (lvqcl @ Jan 13 2012, 10:08) QUOTE ... Jan 13 2012, 19:39 odyssey FlaCUDA usually provides better compression result... Oct 1 2010, 14:13 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th May 2013 - 08:38 |
