FLAC & WMAL (need some input) |
FLAC & WMAL (need some input) |
 Sep 28 2010, 01:06
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 28-September 10 Member No.: 84175  |
Hey fellow audiophiles. I just want to know if I should go through with converting 390 albums in WMAL to FLAC. I'm thinking of switching to Foobar because I don't have a Zune anymore and the Zune software takes up a good amount of resources. OR should I just stay as is and convert any new audio to WMAL forever? Need some input please.
|
 |
 
|
 |
|
Sep 28 2010, 01:28
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 118 Joined: 9-July 10 Member No.: 82156 |
Is there a problem just using your existing WMALs with Foobar? It handles them reasonably as far as I can tell. Conversion of new material is up to you at that point. Since lossless is lossless and foobar can handle WMAL, the only reason for converting to something else would be for some metadata disadvantage of WMAL (or maybe for some slight filesize advantage that probably isn't worth it).
|
|
|
|
Koffee FLAC & WMAL (need some input) Sep 28 2010, 01:06
Koffee I'm kind of an OCD freak and would want an all... Sep 28 2010, 03:04 Engelsstaub There's nothing "wrong" with WMA Los... Sep 28 2010, 07:55 2t0nEg If I were doing it, I'd keep the 390 albums as... Sep 29 2010, 15:27 odyssey As an entire offtopic recommendation, but to suple... Sep 29 2010, 16:40 DragonQ WMAL actually gives better compression ratios than... Oct 1 2010, 12:35
HTS QUOTE (DragonQ @ Oct 1 2010, 06:35) WMAL ... Jan 13 2012, 05:24 Porcus QUOTE (HTS @ Jan 13 2012, 05:24) Hasn... Jan 13 2012, 09:00 lvqcl QUOTE (HTS @ Jan 13 2012, 08:24) But righ... Jan 13 2012, 16:08 HTS QUOTE (lvqcl @ Jan 13 2012, 10:08) QUOTE ... Jan 13 2012, 19:39 odyssey FlaCUDA usually provides better compression result... Oct 1 2010, 14:13 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th May 2013 - 05:25 |
