It is safe to use Medieval CUE Splitter? Options

[quisnox]

I have big collection of music ripped to 'file.flac' & 'file.cue', so I need to split it to separate files.

Currently tested a lot of tools, but Medieval CUE Splitter does task fastest. But is it safe to use for whole collection?

I don't need CRC checksums, just want to split my collection.



p.s. sorry for my poor English..

[quisnox]

Okay okay,

1. I do not need silence before or after tracks/1:1 track copies (by lenght).

2. I need just split my files, do it FAST (because it's about ~150 discographys of different bands, hundreds of albums), and don't hurt quality.

Medieval doesn't encodes files, just physically splits and writes tags, or I'm wrong? If yes, then I fully understand why files won't pass any verification. But by the way - I just want to split for future digital usage (I've never burned audio CD and will never do it in future).

3. I use Linux. Medieval works under Wine, CUEtools requires additional Micro$oft crapware such NET Framework. Default Linux tools like Flacon or shnsplit is a joke.

[greynol]

1. I do not need silence before or after tracks/1:1 track copies (by lenght).

I worry that this program will discard more than just silence (try it with concert, for example).

Medieval doesn't encodes files, just physically splits and writes tags, or I'm wrong?

If it writes to any format besides WAVE or AIFF then it encodes files.

Micro$oft crapware such NET Framework

This is a borderline TOS #2 violation. Let's leave the fanatical zealotry at home, m'kay?