Is still aoTuV better than CVS? |
Is still aoTuV better than CVS? |
 Nov 25 2010, 15:56
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 342 Joined: 24-November 08 Member No.: 63072  |
Hello,
since aoTuV wasnot almost 2 years updated, I wanted to know if it is still better than latest libVorbis, since I know xiph.org adapt the tunings done by aoyumi I suspect it already has all improvements from aoTuV b5.7. Does still aoTuV perform better? |
 |
 
|
 |
|
Nov 27 2010, 05:06
Post
#2
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 1593 Joined: 24-March 02 From: Revere, MA Member No.: 1607 |
QUOTE More channels as stereo: I think, CVS is better, because CVS has channel coupling, and aotuv 5.7 not. The CVS version was optimized for 5.1/7.1 channel coupling due to the need for it in Google WebM project so yes you are right there. It implements are lot of very complicated channel coupling modes, which shave the bitrate down substantially. QUOTE I think what is planned is the opposite: the next official libvorbis (1.4 version), will integrate latest AoTuV tunings. That's the plan as far as I know and what has been stated by Xiph. This is usually the case for most releases as long as Aoyumi wants or plans to continue to tune Vorbis. This post has been edited by HotshotGG: Nov 27 2010, 05:08 -------------------- College student/IT Assistant
|
|
|
|
Anakunda Is still aoTuV better than CVS? Nov 25 2010, 15:56
akapuma QUOTE (Anakunda @ Nov 25 2010, 16:56) sin... Nov 25 2010, 20:27
dutch109 QUOTE (akapuma @ Nov 25 2010, 20:27) Aoyu... Nov 27 2010, 02:10 AlexDDR i guess tha vorbis 1.3.1 is better tha aotuv only ... Nov 25 2010, 23:20 Anakunda QUOTE (AlexDDR @ Nov 25 2010, 23:20) and ... Nov 26 2010, 11:04 AlexDDR TOS #8 again, sorry, but is this like a lack of... Nov 26 2010, 16:40 Xanikseo I have an iriver clix and it also has bad bass wit... Nov 26 2010, 19:06 AlexDDR QUOTE (Xanikseo @ Nov 26 2010, 19:06) I h... Nov 27 2010, 04:51 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 03:48 |
