AAC or MP3, which is better above 175k in most samples? |
AAC or MP3, which is better above 175k in most samples? |
 Jan 26 2011, 16:54
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 12 Joined: 27-June 05 Member No.: 22989  |
lots of device support aac
if aac's quality better than mp3 , I will change format This post has been edited by misuzu: Jan 26 2011, 16:54 |
 |
 
|
 |
|
Feb 19 2011, 09:04
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 70 Joined: 24-November 10 Member No.: 85992 |
Well AAC was originally developed to have better quality at lower bitrates so that battery life could be preserved, thus 128 being the iTunes store default at the time it opened.
|
|
|
|
misuzu AAC or MP3, which is better above 175k in most samples? Jan 26 2011, 16:54
Zarggg You'll need to do your own tests to determine ... Jan 26 2011, 19:23 Fandango After doing some tests, I can say that I don't... Jan 26 2011, 19:35 Louck mp3 can be played even on a kitchen toaster and qu... Jan 27 2011, 19:05 kornchild2002 Although mp3 is still considered to be the "u... Jan 27 2011, 23:46 polemon With all the backing from big companies, AAC will ... Jan 28 2011, 06:15
WonderSlug QUOTE (polemon @ Jan 27 2011, 21:15) Most... Jan 28 2011, 07:10 kwanbis QUOTE (polemon @ Jan 28 2011, 06:15) Most... Jan 28 2011, 07:13
Andavari QUOTE (polemon @ Jan 27 2011, 23:15) With... Feb 19 2011, 23:39 kode54 QUOTE (Andavari @ Feb 19 2011, 14:39) lik... Feb 20 2011, 07:52 Destroid If OP is using a portable player, I might venture ... Jan 28 2011, 06:19 B7k My ears can't tell the difference between lame... Feb 17 2011, 23:30 SCOTU Pretty sure AAC was actually developed in an attem... Feb 19 2011, 19:20 Garf QUOTE (SCOTU @ Feb 19 2011, 19:20) Pretty... Feb 20 2011, 10:53 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th May 2013 - 07:45 |
