AAC or MP3, which is better above 175k in most samples? |
AAC or MP3, which is better above 175k in most samples? |
 Jan 26 2011, 16:54
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 12 Joined: 27-June 05 Member No.: 22989  |
lots of device support aac
if aac's quality better than mp3 , I will change format This post has been edited by misuzu: Jan 26 2011, 16:54 |
 |
 
|
 |
|
Feb 19 2011, 19:20
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 118 Joined: 9-July 10 Member No.: 82156 |
Pretty sure AAC was actually developed in an attempt to make large sums of money by defining a new industry standard.
|
|
|
|
misuzu AAC or MP3, which is better above 175k in most samples? Jan 26 2011, 16:54
Zarggg You'll need to do your own tests to determine ... Jan 26 2011, 19:23 Fandango After doing some tests, I can say that I don't... Jan 26 2011, 19:35 Louck mp3 can be played even on a kitchen toaster and qu... Jan 27 2011, 19:05 kornchild2002 Although mp3 is still considered to be the "u... Jan 27 2011, 23:46 polemon With all the backing from big companies, AAC will ... Jan 28 2011, 06:15
WonderSlug QUOTE (polemon @ Jan 27 2011, 21:15) Most... Jan 28 2011, 07:10 kwanbis QUOTE (polemon @ Jan 28 2011, 06:15) Most... Jan 28 2011, 07:13
Andavari QUOTE (polemon @ Jan 27 2011, 23:15) With... Feb 19 2011, 23:39 kode54 QUOTE (Andavari @ Feb 19 2011, 14:39) lik... Feb 20 2011, 07:52 Destroid If OP is using a portable player, I might venture ... Jan 28 2011, 06:19 B7k My ears can't tell the difference between lame... Feb 17 2011, 23:30 SamDeRe81 Well AAC was originally developed to have better q... Feb 19 2011, 09:04 Garf QUOTE (SCOTU @ Feb 19 2011, 19:20) Pretty... Feb 20 2011, 10:53 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th May 2013 - 16:28 |
