IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

23 Pages V  « < 21 22 23  
Closed TopicStart new topic
IETF Opus codec now ready for testing, That's CELT 0.11
Gainless
post Feb 10 2013, 16:14
Post #551





Group: Members
Posts: 169
Joined: 28-October 11
Member No.: 94764



Has there been any look on fixing up killer samples btw? The unconstrained VBR has definately flaws in some cases, which makes it still safer to use older versions/constrained VBR at high bitrates.

This post has been edited by Gainless: Feb 10 2013, 16:15
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Garf
post Feb 10 2013, 17:32
Post #552


Server Admin


Group: Admin
Posts: 4853
Joined: 24-September 01
Member No.: 13



QUOTE (Seren @ Feb 10 2013, 10:53) *
QUOTE (IgorC @ Feb 10 2013, 09:00) *
If somebody hasn't seen there is an official Opus 1.1 alpha.

https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/opu...alpha-win32.zip

Also some kinda settings to play with
https://wiki.xiph.org/Opus_tuning


Imo official opus binaries should be stickied in a thread of it's own. As posting on a topic like this could likely cause it to be buried.


Maybe a sticky with the latest binaries etc...
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
IgorC
post Feb 10 2013, 18:35
Post #553





Group: Members
Posts: 1506
Joined: 3-January 05
From: Argentina, Bs As
Member No.: 18803



It would be really handy. Like "Nero AAC Recommended Settings" http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....showtopic=44310

This post has been edited by IgorC: Feb 10 2013, 18:38
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DonP
post Feb 13 2013, 17:19
Post #554





Group: Members (Donating)
Posts: 1469
Joined: 11-February 03
From: Vermont
Member No.: 4955



I encoded a bunch of various music at bitrate=100 using the "babyeater" release. The majority showed in foobar properties as between 100 and 110 kb/s, some much higher, and none below target rate. Then I did the math using the whole file size (including metadata and whatever else besides the audio data) and play time on 2 of the files and found in both foobar was reporting the bitrate higher than it should by a few kb/s.

With the case below, that would be (4 969 864 bytes) * (8 bits/byte) / (1024 bit/kbit) / (374.7 seconds) = 103.6 kb/s

Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
nu774
post Feb 13 2013, 17:27
Post #555





Group: Developer
Posts: 476
Joined: 22-November 10
From: Japan
Member No.: 85902



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bit_rate
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jplus
post Feb 13 2013, 17:56
Post #556





Group: Members
Posts: 41
Joined: 7-February 13
Member No.: 106471



Thanks for pointing that out, nu774. So then it becomes 4969864B * 8b/B / 1000b/kb / 374.7s = 106.1kb/s and Foobar2000 turns out to do it right. Now I'm starting to wonder whether my bitrate numbers from opusinfo were calculated using base 10 or base 2.

After checking: opusinfo does it in base 10, too. Note that I used the "without overhead" bitrates from opusinfo in the post that I linked to above. With overhead the numbers are 0.5-2kbps greater.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
db1989
post Feb 15 2013, 16:35
Post #557





Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 5141
Joined: 23-June 06
Member No.: 32180



Done:

QUOTE (Banned @ Feb 14 2013, 06:19) *
I propose that new posts in this thread which do not continue existing discussion here be split off, as Opus has it own subforum.
Opus 1.1 alpha version (not BABYEATER), including softrunner’s post about this version and spectrograms.

QUOTE (jensend @ Feb 14 2013, 23:15) *
Mods, could we get a threadsplit for these quality level posts? I really think this deserves its own thread.
Can audio encoders target quality w/o caring about bit rate/file size?

Some replies somewhat spanned over both topics, as evidenced by my having to begin the latter with another post that (handily!) quoted softrunner’s initial message – if only we could split single posts, too tongue.gif – but I think this works pretty well.

I agree with the sentiment that things should be posted to separate threads if at all possible since there’s a dedicated subforum for Opus now. I’ll see if anything from the past couple of pages here stands out as being split-worthy, but you’ll excuse me if I don’t look too far back. wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

23 Pages V  « < 21 22 23
Closed TopicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th April 2014 - 09:21