IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

aoTuVbeta6.02
Anakunda
post Apr 29 2011, 10:55
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 414
Joined: 24-November 08
Member No.: 63072



Hi, why aoTuVbeta6.02 Compiles are not available @ Rarewarez, could somebody so kind and made oggenc2 + dlls available to public, thankyou
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Destroid
post May 3 2011, 19:18
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 544
Joined: 4-June 02
Member No.: 2220



This test was for multiple reasons: a) to expand my knowledge of DVD video extraction process (heard that CELT did better with 48KHz and figured stereo AC3 converted to WAV would work; b) to test CELT encoding speed in regards to the statement that it was a magnitude faster because of no psy-model and other reasons; c) just another general encoder speed test carried out on a not-so-modern machine. Seems CELT could benefit from optimizations. But anyhow, I ended up putting results here since the OggEnc2 compile (SSE2) above seemed dramatically faster than Venc.

This test focused on lossy encoders aiming for a VBR setting which would result in @100kbps since I figured a DVD commentary track was less complex and needed no 5.1->stereo conversion. I think 100kbps for this material is overkill since there is virtually no audible winner here. Lossless codecs were added to reflect the material was non-complex and easily compressed.
CODE
Encoder/Settings File size Bitrate* Speed* TimeThis
_________________________ __________ __________ _______ ___________
Musepack 1.30 -q 4.99 65,978,894 98.8 kbps 23.99x 222.687 sec
AoTuv 6.03 -q 4 65,996,209 98.8 kbps 13.37x 399.593 sec
OggEnc 2.7 SSE2 -q 4 65,996,560 98.8 kbps 26.71x 200.781 sec
CELT 0.11.2 --bitrate 100 66,843,352 [97.8 kbps] [30.49x] 175.156 sec
Nero AAC 1.5.1.0 -q 0.4 67,192,851 [98.9 kbps] [20.86x] 256.093 sec
OggEnc 2.7 SSE2 -q 4.1 67,515,708 101.1 kbps 26.57x 201.078 sec
AoTuv 6.03 -q 4.1 67,516,144 101.1 kbps 13.31x 401.265 sec
LAME 3.99 alpha16 -V 5 68,150,160 102.1 kbps 14.10x 379.500 sec
Musepack 1.16 -q 4.99 68,544,320 102.7 kbps 24.03x 222.281 sec
Helix MP3 5.1 -V90 69,001,032 103.4 Kbps [104.99x] 50.875 sec
Musepack 1.30 -q 5 72,427,994 108.5 kbps 23.73x 225.171 sec
Helix MP3 5.1 -V100 72,959,688 109.3 Kbps [102.59x] 52.062 sec
Musepack 1.16 -q 5 75,120,664 112.5 kbps 23.77x 225.406 sec
WAVE (16bit 48KHz 2ch) 1,025,507,372 1536 kbps - - - - - - - - - -
FLAC 1.2.0 -5 312,449,472 468 kbps [88.90x] 60.078 sec
Monkey's Audio -c2000** 312,394,832 468 kbps [166.22x] 32.328 sec
WavPack 4.60 311,117,884 465 kbps [95.57x] 55.890 sec
TAK 2.1.0 -p 2 281,036,191 421 kbps 122.28x 43.718 sec


* values reported by encoder, brackets indicate user-calculated values
** old/deprecated version of codec used, don't ask


--------------------
"Something bothering you, Mister Spock?"
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
IgorC
post May 3 2011, 19:56
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 1506
Joined: 3-January 05
From: Argentina, Bs As
Member No.: 18803



Those were interesting numbers.

QUOTE (Destroid @ May 3 2011, 15:18) *
I think 100kbps for this material is overkill since there is virtually no audible winner here.

Since it is DVD audio track then even 64-80 kbps will be more than enough (excluding MP3 perhaps)

This post has been edited by IgorC: May 3 2011, 20:05
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Anakunda   aoTuVbeta6.02   Apr 29 2011, 10:55
- - alter4   Do you mean 6.03?   Apr 29 2011, 11:01
- - Anakunda   sure, 6.03 it's couple of days   May 1 2011, 17:15
|- - Anakunda   QUOTE (Anakunda @ May 1 2011, 18:15) sure...   May 1 2011, 18:58
- - punkrockdude   I replace the oggenc2.exe from rarewares with your...   May 1 2011, 20:40
|- - Anakunda   QUOTE (punkrockdude @ May 1 2011, 21:40) ...   May 1 2011, 20:53
- - punkrockdude   Oh, I see. This Intel Centrino only has SSE2 I thi...   May 1 2011, 20:54
- - Anakunda   Ah so, If I get some positive confirmation about p...   May 1 2011, 20:57
- - punkrockdude   I just tried it on my Intel Q9550 with Windows 7 x...   May 1 2011, 21:10
|- - Anakunda   Just for the case I`ve made a more generic bui...   May 1 2011, 21:16
- - punkrockdude   The generic version worked on my Intel Centrino 1....   May 1 2011, 21:22
- - punkrockdude   By the way, thank you a lot for these builds! ...   May 1 2011, 21:27
- - punkrockdude   Is it a lot of work to make a SSE2 version. I do n...   May 1 2011, 21:32
|- - Anakunda   QUOTE (punkrockdude @ May 1 2011, 22:32) ...   May 1 2011, 21:45
|- - punkrockdude   QUOTE (Anakunda @ May 1 2011, 22:45) QUOT...   May 1 2011, 21:47
- - lvqcl   In the meantime you can test my compile. It doesn...   May 1 2011, 22:05
|- - john33   QUOTE (lvqcl @ May 1 2011, 22:05) In the ...   May 5 2011, 11:06
- - Destroid   Thanks for that. Tested SSE2 version on Athlon64 3...   May 3 2011, 10:08
- - Destroid   This test was for multiple reasons: a) to expand m...   May 3 2011, 19:18
|- - IgorC   Those were interesting numbers. QUOTE (Destroid ...   May 3 2011, 19:56
- - john33   A full set of beta6.03 compiles is now at Rareware...   May 4 2011, 15:47
- - Destroid   john33- I noticed your P4 compile is much slower t...   May 5 2011, 00:46
|- - john33   QUOTE (Destroid @ May 5 2011, 00:46) john...   May 5 2011, 09:54
- - IgorC   Ive experienced slow encoding speed too with rare...   May 5 2011, 03:00
- - Destroid   Great, it's the compiler. The Rarewares generi...   May 5 2011, 04:17
- - Anakunda   I have compared the speeds and lvqcl's oggenc ...   May 5 2011, 09:43
- - Anakunda   I have compared speeds of my test oggenc compile p...   May 5 2011, 11:49
- - Steve Forte Rio   Quick comparison (single thread): john33 (x64) - ...   May 5 2011, 13:02
- - lvqcl   Some SSE optimizations from Lancer code (for aoTuV...   May 5 2011, 17:59
|- - john33   QUOTE (lvqcl @ May 5 2011, 17:59) Some SS...   May 5 2011, 18:45
- - lvqcl   QUOTE (john33)I've not tried fast=2, does that...   May 5 2011, 19:38
|- - john33   QUOTE (lvqcl @ May 5 2011, 19:38) QUOTE (...   May 5 2011, 19:48
|- - Destroid   QUOTE (lvqcl @ May 5 2011, 18:38) Destroi...   May 6 2011, 12:22
- - _m_   QUOTE I just tested and it turns out that /fp:fast...   May 5 2011, 20:43
- - Destroid   Back with a new batch of test results. Same commen...   May 6 2011, 21:10
|- - lvqcl   QUOTE (Destroid @ May 7 2011, 00:10) CODE...   May 7 2011, 10:09
- - Destroid   I re-ran the Vorbis tests again, this time at -q2....   May 7 2011, 07:03


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th April 2014 - 23:12