TAK 2.2.0 - Alpha release Options

[TBeck]

Alpha release 1 of TAK 2.2.0 ((T)om's lossless (A)udio (K)ompressor)

It consists of:

- TAK Applications 2.2.0 Alpha 1 b in "\Applications".
- TAK Winamp plugin 2.2.0 Alpha 1 in "\WinAmp".
- TAK Decoding library 2.2.0 Alpha 1 in "\Deco_Lib".

The final release will additionally contain the SDK.

Download:

Download link removed. TAK 2.2.0 Final has been released.

What's new

This release brings support for multi-channel audio and speed optimizations for encoder and decoder.

New features:

- Support for multi-channel audio. While the stream format supports up to 16 channels, the codec currently is restricted to a maximum of 6 channels.
- Support for the "Wave Format Extensible" file format.

Improvements:

- Encoding speed improvements of up to 10 percent for my primary file set. Most of it is achieved by a modification of the algorithm which selects the optimal predictor order for each subframe. It will now often use less predictors than before, what may on average result in about 0.01 percent worse compression. You will only notice an speed advantage, if your files benefit from high predictor orders.
- Decoding speed improvements of up to 18 percent for my primary file set. Some of it is attributed to the above-noted modification of the encoder's predictor order selection algorithm. Therefore it will only take effect when decoding files encoded with this version and only, if they benefit from high predictor orders. Additionally SSSE3-instructions can be used for predictor counts of 32 and more. This affects the presets p3, p4 and sometimes p2, but only, if a particular file benefits from high predictor orders.

Known issues:

- If you use pipe decoding and the application reading the pipe is beeing terminated before the whole file has been read, TAKC may get into an endless loop and has to be manually killed with the task manager. I don't think this is a big issue but i will try to fix it in one of the next versions. BTW: Big thanks to shnutils for testing the pipe decoding!
- There seem to be some compatibility issues with pipe decoding to some other applications ("crc1632.exe" has been reported). I will try to fix it in the next release.

Alpha testing

This alpha release has already gone through extensive testing performed by my automatic scripts. Nevertheless there may be bugs left. Especially because i had to write a lot of new code for the support of multi-channel audio. This also involved a lot of minor modifications of the existing code. Therefore i would like you to verify the proper function of the codec: Compress -> Decompress -> Compare resulting wave with the original file, either by a binary compare or by the use MD5-check sums.

Certainly i am very interested into efficiency comparisons of the new multi-channel audio codec and other compressors.

Some remarks:

The most time consuming part of the new codec is it's channel decorrelation mechanism. The strongest presets sometimes check any possible channel combination. Principially you have n * (n - 1) (n = channel count) possible combinations, if you count "A predicts B" and "B predicts A" as two combinations.

Some figures:

2 channels -> 2 combinations
4 channels -> 12 combinations
5 channels -> 20 combinations
6 channels -> 30 combinations
8 channels -> 56 combinations

This rapid increase is the reason, why the codec currently is restricted to a maximum of 6 channels. I have to find and evaluate more heuristics for a fast estimation of optimal pairings which doesn't require a full evaluation of all possibilities.

Some are alreaday working. Most of them rely on the presence of a speaker assignment mask in the source wave file. If present, some faster presets will only test those combinations, which were most useful in my evaluations. A low frequency channel will never be evaluated.

But this only works, if the speaker assignment is known. Therefore the encoding time of the same audio data may differ considerably dependent on the presence of a speaker mask in the original wave file.

Im my evaluations the new codec often did beat Mpeg4Als -7 compressionwise, if a particular file provided good opportunities for channel decorrelation. Unfortunately for some files there are zero opportunities. My test corpus is still too small to make any generalized statement regarding the new codecs efficiency.

Therefore i am very interested into compression results and comparisons with other codecs.

Thanks for testing and have fun

Thomas

This post has been edited by TBeck: Jul 10 2011, 23:53

[Destroid]

I managed to finish a preview of a TAK benchmark due to a conversion issue.* This short test only covers TAK and not other multichannel encoders. The end result is that TAK 2.2.0 completed the test successfully without any errors, also noted encoding speed-ups with stereo material. Machine used: Athlon XP 3000+, 2GB, WD1.5GB SATA, WinXP SP3, NTFS.*

CODE

Source files:
DTS source 6ch 16bit 48KHz 3.29GB 102:19.125 RG -5.61dB
CD audio 1 2ch 16bit 44.1KHz 297MB 29:26.392 RG -9.75dB
CD audio 2 2ch 16bit 44.1KHz 304MB 30:07.258 RG -10.71dB


encoder / file enc timer301.exe (enc / dec)
(-p2 setting) ratio enc / dec speed (Kernel) (User) (Process)
-------------- ------ ----------------- ----------------------------------
TAK 2.2.0 DTS 40.30% 15.49x / 59.00x (2% / 13%) (95% / 75%) (98% / 88%)
TAK 2.2.0 CD 1 67.12% 115.10x / 197.68x (6% / 14%) (85% / 83%) (91% / 98%)
TAK 2.2.0 CD 2 68.96% 114.53x / 191.90x (5% / 12%) (86% / 84%) (91% / 96%)
TAK 2.1.0 CD 1 67.12% 110.49x / 192.62x (5% / 14%) (86% / 80%) (91% / 94%)
TAK 2.1.0 CD 2 68.96% 106.71x / 191.48x (5% / 12%) (84% / 83%) (90% / 95%)


bitcompared decoded TAK files with original WAV files = No differences.

*conversion issue: TAK reports Wave file not supported on WAV files with durations >02:04:16 (converted DTS->WAV using FB2K v1.1.6, foo_input_dts.dll v0.3.0 & specs above). Sizes of resulting WAV files are shown to be 4.04GB and 4.10GB even though every media player reports a durations of 02:04:16 for both those files. Anyone give me hint at fixing this (possibly) WAV header issue?