Stuff for the AAC 96 kbps listening test, Bitrate tables, sample files, etc |
- No over 30 sec clips of copyrighted music. Cite properly and never more than necessary for the discussion.
- No copyrighted software without permission.
- Click here for complete Hydrogenaudio Terms of Service
![]() ![]() |
Stuff for the AAC 96 kbps listening test, Bitrate tables, sample files, etc |
Jul 10 2011, 12:55
Post
#26
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 3620 Joined: 14-May 03 From: Bad Herrenalb Member No.: 6613 |
There were 30 samples in previous test. Large number of samples helps to get more statistically valid results. It was a good decision (not a coincidence). The only price to pay is some extra time for recollecting the samples. So, there will be 20 samples in this test. But it was a lower bitrate test. The higher the bitrate, the more difficult it is to spot differences and then people might lose interest if there are a lot of samples. Anyways, your decision. -------------------- http://listening-tests.hydrogenaudio.org/sebastian/
|
|
|
|
Jul 11 2011, 01:15
Post
#27
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 288 Joined: 14-August 06 Member No.: 34027 |
Every suggestion has a down side. It will be very difficult to classify artifacts. Somebody hears some temporal distortion other hears stereo issues. The artifacts are rarely have a single nature. We will have days and days of hot discussions and probably will end with the same situation as purely random choice. I was thinking more along the lines of genre or type: music, spoken word, sample, effect, etc. I don't think it would take that long to classify.. listen to a few seconds of each sample. Besides, shouldn't someone be checking every sample anyways? To ensure it is a valid file and not corrupted or some joke. |
|
|
|
Jul 11 2011, 02:57
Post
#28
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1314 Joined: 3-January 05 From: Argentina, Bs As Member No.: 18803 |
There were 30 samples in previous test. Large number of samples helps to get more statistically valid results. So, there will be 20 samples in this test. But it was a lower bitrate test. The higher the bitrate, the more difficult it is to spot differences and then people might lose interest if there are a lot of samples. Anyways, your decision. I understand your fears. Some people told me it was insane to include 30 samples. But a lot of listeners have participated in last test and there were a lot of results. Yes, it was 64 kbits and 30 samples. It's not about being child but 20 samples are still affordable at 96 kbps. Encoders are good but artifacts are still easy distinguishable. So, twenty, Sebastian, twenty. This post has been edited by IgorC: Jul 11 2011, 02:58 |
|
|
|
Jul 11 2011, 06:06
Post
#29
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1314 Joined: 3-January 05 From: Argentina, Bs As Member No.: 18803 |
|
|
|
|
Jul 11 2011, 07:25
Post
#30
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 288 Joined: 14-August 06 Member No.: 34027 |
To ensure it is a valid file and not corrupted or some joke. Have you seen any corrupted, invalid or some joke files in previous public tests? A standard disclaimer in financial investments is that “past results do not guarantee future returns.” |
|
|
|
Jul 11 2011, 18:53
Post
#31
|
|
![]() Group: Developer Posts: 2980 Joined: 2-December 07 Member No.: 49183 |
2 samples from Muse - Absolution:
1.
Apocalypse.flac ( 2.5MB )
Number of downloads: 18710 last seconds of "Intro", then 17 seconds of "Apocalypse Please" 2.
Hysteria.flac ( 2.86MB )
Number of downloads: 12010 last seconds of "Interlude", then 20 seconds of "Hysteria" This post has been edited by lvqcl: Jul 11 2011, 21:18 |
|
|
|
Jul 11 2011, 19:23
Post
#32
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1314 Joined: 3-January 05 From: Argentina, Bs As Member No.: 18803 |
|
|
|
|
Jul 11 2011, 20:03
Post
#33
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 94 Joined: 4-June 06 From: Ponta Grossa,PR Member No.: 31450 |
2 samples from Muse - Absolution: 1.
Apocalypse.flac ( 2.5MB )
Number of downloads: 18710 last seconds of "Intro", then 17 seconds of "Apocalypse Please" 2. Hysteria.flac: 10 last seconds of "Interlude", then 17 seconds of "Hysteria" {sorry, will be uploaded later} Good samples, anyway they are almost the same isn't? Stereo effect, syntetised guitar, piano. This post has been edited by Diow: Jul 11 2011, 20:04 -------------------- Sorry for my bad english.
|
|
|
|
Jul 11 2011, 22:05
Post
#34
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1303 Joined: 14-September 05 From: Helsinki, Finland Member No.: 24472 |
Electronic music samples from my archive for testing high frequency fidelity. Apparently the encoders in this test use a low pass frequency of about 15 kHz. These samples have distinct high frequency content from about 13 kHz up to 20 kHz.
Some of the samples are also otherwise difficult (in addition to the more or less audible lowpass). I tested quickly Nero and Winamp/FhG (I didn't have time to configure and test the QuickTime encoder on this PC now). For example, Wild And Blue 1 is very difficult for Nero. FhG is better with this sample. On the other hand Go Jam And Spoon Mix is quite a killer to FhG. Nero handles it better. Go Jam And Spoon Mix ![]()
Go_Jam_And_Spoon_Mix.flac ( 2.28MB )
Number of downloads: 128Return Of The Tempel ![]()
Return_Of_The_Tempel.flac ( 3.39MB )
Number of downloads: 117Wild And Blue 1 ![]()
Wild_And_Blue_1.flac ( 2.95MB )
Number of downloads: 103Wild And Blue 2 ![]()
Wild_And_Blue_2.flac ( 3.54MB )
Number of downloads: 115This post has been edited by Alex B: Jul 11 2011, 22:09 -------------------- http://listening-tests.freetzi.com
|
|
|
|
Jul 11 2011, 22:06
Post
#35
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1314 Joined: 3-January 05 From: Argentina, Bs As Member No.: 18803 |
It also important to have a mixed class of samples (voice + music)
Example:
Attached File(s)
|
|
|
|
Jul 12 2011, 13:21
Post
#36
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 690 Joined: 22-April 06 Member No.: 29877 |
Sample from Kraftwerk's Radio-Activity.
Creates pre-echo and tonality problems at low bitrates.
Attached File(s)
-------------------- "I never thought I'd see this much candy in one mission!"
|
|
|
|
Jul 13 2011, 04:01
Post
#37
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 690 Joined: 22-April 06 Member No.: 29877 |
-- Please delete --
This post has been edited by /mnt: Jul 13 2011, 04:27 -------------------- "I never thought I'd see this much candy in one mission!"
|
|
|
|
Jul 13 2011, 04:46
Post
#38
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1314 Joined: 3-January 05 From: Argentina, Bs As Member No.: 18803 |
I remind that random selection of sample will be perfomed in less than 12 hours. (12:00 GMT -3) here http://rolz.org/?p=group# in looby room
|
|
|
|
Jul 13 2011, 15:09
Post
#39
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 373 Joined: 4-October 08 From: Ukraine Member No.: 59301 |
I remind that random selection of sample will be perfomed in less than 12 hours. (12:00 GMT -3) here http://rolz.org/?p=group# in looby room Sorry, but did you mean lobby? |
|
|
|
Jul 13 2011, 15:48
Post
#40
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1314 Joined: 3-January 05 From: Argentina, Bs As Member No.: 18803 |
Yes, my mistake.
And it will start in 10 minutes. |
|
|
|
Jul 13 2011, 15:59
Post
#41
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 373 Joined: 4-October 08 From: Ukraine Member No.: 59301 |
Here is the final table of samples sorted by musical genre.
After the random selection this table (with selected samples marked) will by also uploaded to this thread.
Attached File(s)
|
|
|
|
Jul 13 2011, 16:40
Post
#42
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 373 Joined: 4-October 08 From: Ukraine Member No.: 59301 |
Here is the result of random selection.
The samples will be uploaded here within ~1 hour.
Attached File(s)
|
|
|
|
Jul 13 2011, 18:12
Post
#43
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 373 Joined: 4-October 08 From: Ukraine Member No.: 59301 |
Unfortunately for now I have some connection problems. Hopefully the samples will be uploaded today by /mnt.
This post has been edited by Steve Forte Rio: Jul 13 2011, 18:28 |
|
|
|
Jul 14 2011, 15:32
Post
#45
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 86 Joined: 16-June 06 Member No.: 31911 |
|
|
|
|
Jul 14 2011, 16:57
Post
#46
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 373 Joined: 4-October 08 From: Ukraine Member No.: 59301 |
Great! Thank you very much, nao Now we have access to every encoder through the command line. Alex B, thanks. Uploading really wasn't necessary. |
|
|
|
Jul 14 2011, 19:10
Post
#47
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 690 Joined: 22-April 06 Member No.: 29877 |
Looks like the Pop / Rock section scored some good samples.
Awesome, thanks! Jerkin Back 'n Forth http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....ost&id=6585 Are we not men? -------------------- "I never thought I'd see this much candy in one mission!"
|
|
|
|
Jul 14 2011, 19:25
Post
#48
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1303 Joined: 14-September 05 From: Helsinki, Finland Member No.: 24472 |
-------------------- http://listening-tests.freetzi.com
|
|
|
|
Jul 15 2011, 05:37
Post
#49
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1314 Joined: 3-January 05 From: Argentina, Bs As Member No.: 18803 |
ABCHR configurations for verification
Attached File(s)
|
|
|
|
Jul 17 2011, 18:33
Post
#50
|
|
![]() Group: Developer Posts: 2980 Joined: 2-December 07 Member No.: 49183 |
ctaacenc: a slightly modified version of fhgaacenc that works with enc_aacplus.dll instead of enc_fhgaac.dll (this zip file doesn't include libsndfile DLL; copy it from fhgaacenc bundle).
[attachment=6625:ctaacenc_20110717.zip] |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th May 2013 - 21:46 |