Help with CueTools and burning, understanding the offset option in CueTools |
![]() ![]() |
Help with CueTools and burning, understanding the offset option in CueTools |
Jul 13 2011, 01:25
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 5-March 11 Member No.: 88710 |
I have .wav files from a cd that was ripped a long time ago. I don't know what it was ripped with. When I load the files in Cuetools and verifiy them I get this..
AR: offset 33, rip accurate (12/12), CTDB: verified OK, confidence 83, or verified OK, confidence 13. What do I do with the offset of 33 to get a perfect burned copy of the cd? I usually use EAC to burn my cd's from my own non-compliant cue sheets. My drive has a read offset value of 6 so in EAC in the drive write options I put in a -6 to compensate. I tried changing it to -33 for this perticular disc to burn but when it was done and I re-ripped it Accuraterip says it cannot be verified as accurate so I must be doing something wrong. Any help would be great. thanks |
|
|
|
Jul 13 2011, 04:18
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 677 Joined: 4-May 08 Member No.: 53282 |
Your drive offset in EAC & the offset in CT from another drive are not the same thing. You cannot use one to fix the other...
It seems your CD was ripped by a drive with non-corrected +33 offset. Use CT fix offset feature & then burn with your correct drive offset. I haven't burned in a while but that should do the trick, AFAIR. Your CD might be accurate but in the end without a CUE Sheet you will never know for 100% sure if your CD is a perfect copy (Outside of raw audio data). For exemple the original CD might have pre-emphasis which you will never know. Those cases are very rare but exist. That gave me the idea that maybe CTDB should store pre-emphasis flag info for dummy cue, just like data track length. Edit: Why is this in the upload forum ? This post has been edited by sauvage78: Jul 13 2011, 04:54 -------------------- CDImage+CUE
Secure [Low/C2/AR(2)] Flac -4 |
|
|
|
Jul 13 2011, 06:32
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Super Moderator Posts: 9265 Joined: 1-April 04 Member No.: 13167 |
Never heard of a drive with an offset of 33 samples and I doubt anyone else around here has either.
With that in mind, why correct what is a perfectly good rip just to match a particular pressing that you don't own? This post has been edited by greynol: Jul 13 2011, 06:33 -------------------- Everything sounds the same until it is proven otherwise.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 14:50 |