Question to someone who knows LAME source code, Strange reordering happens in count1 values |
Question to someone who knows LAME source code, Strange reordering happens in count1 values |
Sep 27 2011, 09:31
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 54 Joined: 20-October 10 Member No.: 84756 |
Greetings!
I am toying with LAME source code to do some MDCT coefficients manipulation. I noticed something very strange. Count1 bits are shuffled around between input and output. I am using CBR part of LAME at 320kbits. In module quantize.c in function CBR_iteration_loop after iteration_finish_one I output to console a number of last values from MDCT coefficients (exactly - from #406 to #566) In decoding algorithm (stnadart ISO decoder) once again i output those values. For example: Values during input: 3 2 2 0 1 1 1 0 4 0 3 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 (zeroes) Values during output: 3 2 2 0 1 1 1 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (zeroes) So, from my POV, Count1 values are in the wrong order. Moreover: On input side, bigvalues = 210, count1 = 2, rzero = 74 On output side, bigvalues = 209, count1 = 3, rzero = 73 Maybe on input side something happens with granule's MDCT valeus after iteration_finish_one(gfc, gr, ch); Or maybe something else happens somewhere i dont know? Thanks for any help in advance! |
|
|
|
![]() |
Sep 27 2011, 12:07
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 648 Joined: 10-January 06 From: Zagreb Member No.: 27018 |
Maybe because lame threw away all ISO code? Just guessing...
|
|
|
|
Istrebitel Question to someone who knows LAME source code Sep 27 2011, 09:31
Istrebitel PS: I think i found the problem source. In the ISO... Sep 27 2011, 10:39
Istrebitel Well, i checked with Audacity, it produces the sam... Sep 27 2011, 15:30![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 15:40 |