IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

16 Pages V  « < 14 15 16  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
LAME 3.99 is out, 2012-02-28: version 3.99.5 has been released
Emiliano55
post May 28 2012, 00:48
Post #376





Group: Members
Posts: 56
Joined: 19-August 05
Member No.: 24022



Thanks! If speed is the only difference then I will use the x64. I asked that because i noticed many people are still using the 32bit version... I guess I will have to assume they all have 32bit systems ?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rohangc
post May 30 2012, 03:55
Post #377





Group: Members
Posts: 569
Joined: 1-December 02
From: India
Member No.: 3948



QUOTE (Alex B @ Mar 30 2012, 13:52) *
QUOTE (rohangc @ Mar 29 2012, 05:39) *
I see the exact same behavior on my machine running Windows 7 64-bit and with an AMD Phenom II X6 processor (that does support SSE2 instructions). I see the crash on both LAME 3.99.4 and 3.99.5.

QUOTE (apodtele @ Mar 29 2012, 16:37) *
Please post the parameters that cause the crash. That would be swell.

3.99.5 fixed this problem for me. (on Athlon XP 3200+ / 32-bit Win 7)


Hi Alex. I confirm that 3.99.5 has fixed the problem on my machine too (I upgraded Foobar2000 to 1.1.12a for good measure).
Last night I transcoded all my FLAC files using LAME 3.99.5 and all went well without any hitches.

Thanks!
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
IgorC
post Sep 29 2012, 21:44
Post #378





Group: Members
Posts: 1506
Joined: 3-January 05
From: Argentina, Bs As
Member No.: 18803



Some speed test for LAME 3.99.5 V 5 on Atom N2600.

foobar converter (5 threads)

rarewares'es build - 21.5x
gcc 4.6/MinGW build - 30.3x http://tmkk.pv.land.to/lame/index_e.html


AFAIK Atom CPU is a paticular case. Some binaries might actually run slower on it.
Wonder if there are any optimized binaries for Atom. Still pretty impressed with 30x speed for this little monster with TDP just 3.5 Watts. cool.gif

This post has been edited by IgorC: Sep 29 2012, 21:46
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
eahm
post Sep 29 2012, 22:14
Post #379





Group: Members
Posts: 884
Joined: 11-February 12
Member No.: 97076



30x is impressive for the Atom!

i7-2700k
RareWares: 252.63x
gcc 4.6/MinGW compiled binary for Windows: 271.76x

This post has been edited by eahm: Sep 29 2012, 22:19
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
NewQuestions
post Oct 5 2012, 14:16
Post #380





Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 5-October 12
Member No.: 103649



Important diff. between lame3.98.4.exe and lame3.99.5.exe: "unrecognized option --ns-treble" - The automation in arts reduces quality and the possibility to create new things
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ManekiNeko
post Apr 16 2013, 02:47
Post #381





Group: Members
Posts: 74
Joined: 7-April 09
Member No.: 68742



QUOTE (eahm @ Sep 29 2012, 22:14) *
30x is impressive for the Atom!

i7-2700k
RareWares: 252.63x
gcc 4.6/MinGW compiled binary for Windows: 271.76x


I just tested that build (64 bit version). Damn, that's fast! (Core i5 2500k). To your knowledge, is it the fastest encoding lame 3.99.5 build?

Also, the page states: "64-bit version is not verified to work". I've only tested a few albums which worked fine and the mp3 files seem identical to the ones encoded with the rarewares x64 build. Have you experienced any issues with it?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

16 Pages V  « < 14 15 16
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st April 2014 - 04:30