I use EAC V1.0 beta 1 and lame 3.99 Just wondering is -B 320 -q0 bette, -b 320 -q0 vs -b 320 |
![]() ![]() |
I use EAC V1.0 beta 1 and lame 3.99 Just wondering is -B 320 -q0 bette, -b 320 -q0 vs -b 320 |
Nov 10 2011, 17:01
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 15 Joined: 30-October 10 Member No.: 85062 |
I read that VBR -V0 uses -q0 by default why isn't -V0 default in CBR instead it's default to -q3. Are there any reasoning why they choose -q3 by default? Just wondering if i should go with the -b 320 -q0 instead of the default -b 320.
This post has been edited by downdahill: Nov 10 2011, 17:03 |
|
|
|
Nov 10 2011, 22:50
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 582 Joined: 12-May 06 From: Colorado, USA Member No.: 30694 |
First look at the documentation for -q:
http://lame.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/lam...detailed.html#q There you'll see that CBR's -q and VBR's -q mean different things. However, there was also a change in 3.99 such that CBR and ABR are now using the VBR psy model & quantization code, so it's possible the interpretation of -q has also changed. Does anyone know for sure? |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 17:12 |