USAC vs. HE- and LC-AAC, Split from: 2012 ripping/encoding general poll, Topic ID: 92660 |
USAC vs. HE- and LC-AAC, Split from: 2012 ripping/encoding general poll, Topic ID: 92660 |
 Jan 2 2012, 16:52
Post
#1
|
|
 Group: Developer Posts: 618 Joined: 6-December 08 From: Erlangen Germany Member No.: 64012  |
Although it would be nice, I doubt anyone will be using USAC for ripping this year
 Interesting that opening the ALAC source code doesn't seem to have influenced its popularity. Chris -------------------- If I don't reply to your reply, it means I agree with you.
|
 |
 
|
 |
|
Jan 3 2012, 13:40
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 149 Joined: 28-October 11 Member No.: 94764 |
QUOTE (C.R.Helmrich @ Jan 2 2012, 16:52)  Although it would be nice, I doubt anyone will be using USAC for ripping this year Chris Will USAC be better than HE-AAC? |
|
|
|
|
Jan 5 2012, 19:04
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1315 Joined: 3-January 05 From: Argentina, Bs As Member No.: 18803 |
USAC with SBR at 64 kbps is equivalent to HE-AAC ~70 kbps (max 75 kbps). LC-AAC at 80 kbps is superior than both of them.
This post has been edited by IgorC: Jan 5 2012, 19:07 |
|
|
|
 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th May 2013 - 04:03 |
