Minimum number of required ABX trials, Split from from topic ID: 92851 |
Minimum number of required ABX trials, Split from from topic ID: 92851 |
Jan 12 2012, 00:41
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 677 Joined: 4-May 08 Member No.: 53282 |
The minimal number of trials depends on how successfull you are.
How quickly you are sucessfull shows how confident in yourself you are. The time & number of sucessfull trials are tied, you should never separate them when judging an ABX log. With F2K ABX component, 8 sucessfull trials in a row (& if all successfull in a row, it usually means quick) trials is the minimum for me. As soon as you begin to fail you can easyly increase to 10 or 12 to try to "erease" your failures. In this case if you fail once or twice you can usually still get a signifiant result although it usually means the ABXing was hard, & by consequence longer as you begin to hesitate. Usually if you begin to fail more than 3 times on 12 trials, it begins to be so hard & you have so much hesitation that it begins to take forever to ABX. At this stage I usually give up by myself & declare that I cannot ABX as in general it means I am not sure that the audio part I am focusing on actually contains any real artefact. This post has been edited by sauvage78: Jan 12 2012, 00:42 -------------------- CDImage+CUE
Secure [Low/C2/AR(2)] Flac -4 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jan 12 2012, 04:46
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1318 Joined: 3-January 05 From: Argentina, Bs As Member No.: 18803 |
I think I understand what sauvage78 wants to say. It's not like You (saratoga and greynol) haven't done ABX test but rather that in real life the claim part will post wrong ABX results or in worse case will cheat (maybe even on him/herself) once will be tired to perform unsuccessful ABX. So again we are at the same place: credibility & statistics.
I prefer games "let's figure out it together" instead of "you catch me now" This post has been edited by IgorC: Jan 12 2012, 04:51 |
|
|
|
sauvage78 Minimum number of required ABX trials Jan 12 2012, 00:41
greynol It is expected that you choose the number of trial... Jan 12 2012, 00:44
saratoga QUOTE (sauvage78 @ Jan 11 2012, 18:41) Th... Jan 12 2012, 00:45
sauvage78 Well there is the theory & there is real life ... Jan 12 2012, 00:56
saratoga QUOTE (sauvage78 @ Jan 11 2012, 18:56) To... Jan 12 2012, 01:05
greynol He should be conducting sets of 16 trials at first... Jan 12 2012, 01:10
sauvage78 I never said I judged this test valid, I only gave... Jan 12 2012, 01:13
saratoga QUOTE (sauvage78 @ Jan 11 2012, 19:13) I ... Jan 12 2012, 01:17
greynol QUOTE (sauvage78 @ Jan 11 2012, 16:13) I ... Jan 12 2012, 01:20
sauvage78 saratoga:
Yes, I had the feeling that you were thi... Jan 12 2012, 01:27
saratoga QUOTE (sauvage78 @ Jan 11 2012, 19:27) Ye... Jan 12 2012, 01:32
greynol QUOTE (saratoga @ Jan 11 2012, 16:32) del... Jan 12 2012, 01:42
sauvage78 Well I know this topic isn't about me but my... Jan 12 2012, 02:31
greynol The difference between you and the OP is that you ... Jan 12 2012, 02:54
sauvage78 I don't even need a log anymore to trust /mnt ... Jan 12 2012, 03:30
IgorC A lot of discussion here but it won't change t... Jan 12 2012, 03:55
saratoga QUOTE (IgorC @ Jan 11 2012, 21:55) A lot ... Jan 12 2012, 04:06
sauvage78 Even if I think 5 trials is too low to convince ot... Jan 12 2012, 04:01
greynol QUOTE (sauvage78 @ Jan 11 2012, 19:01) Ig... Jan 12 2012, 04:13
saratoga QUOTE (sauvage78 @ Jan 11 2012, 22:01) Ev... Jan 12 2012, 04:13
saratoga QUOTE (IgorC @ Jan 11 2012, 22:46) It... Jan 12 2012, 04:50
IgorC QUOTE (saratoga @ Jan 12 2012, 00:50) QUO... Jan 12 2012, 04:57
sauvage78 QUOTE Are you claiming that I (or greynol) have no... Jan 12 2012, 04:54
saratoga QUOTE (sauvage78 @ Jan 11 2012, 22:54) QU... Jan 12 2012, 05:02
IgorC QUOTE (sauvage78 @ Jan 12 2012, 00:54) It... Jan 12 2012, 05:03
greynol QUOTE (IgorC @ Jan 11 2012, 20:03) So it... Jan 12 2012, 05:19
sauvage78 IgorC:
I was more trying to say that if TOS8 is ve... Jan 12 2012, 05:02
IgorC QUOTE (sauvage78 @ Jan 12 2012, 01:02) Ig... Jan 12 2012, 05:06
nesf From a complete newbie perspective: It could have ... Jan 12 2012, 11:08
saratoga QUOTE (nesf @ Jan 12 2012, 05:08) From a ... Jan 12 2012, 23:15
apodtele Please read Fallacy of p-value.
I just want to po... Jan 12 2012, 17:09
Porcus QUOTE (apodtele @ Jan 12 2012, 17:09) Ple... Jan 12 2012, 22:07
krabapple It looks like we're groping towards a discussi... Jan 12 2012, 18:00
nesf A Dummies guide for doing some basic two sample an... Jan 13 2012, 01:59![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th June 2013 - 12:40 |