LAME 3.93.1 vs 3.90.3 |
LAME 3.93.1 vs 3.90.3 |
 May 11 2003, 11:51
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 90 Joined: 27-April 03 Member No.: 6233  |
LAME 3.93.1 using --preset standard -Z: 6,563,619 bytes
LAME 3.90.3 using --alt-preset standard (-Z is default): 6,775,038 bytes why? is there a quality difference? |
 |
 
|
 |
 May 11 2003, 18:18
Post
#2
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 70 Joined: 22-April 03 Member No.: 6122 |
QUOTE (amano @ May 11 2003 - 06:32 PM) the rounding mode is now more technically "correct", but the --alt-presets are not tested with it properly. if they "overcompensate" the wrong rounding mode, a quality regression MAY have occurred (though nothing is proven yet). Hm... the presets are optimized for 3.90.2 and because of different routines 3.93.1 uses they'll probably result in bad quality. So there's no need for a 3.93.1 compile with the --alt-presets. Unless it's results are better with the presets, but I don't think so... Ô_o |
|
|
|
ye110man LAME 3.93.1 vs 3.90.3 May 11 2003, 11:51
Gabriel Because 3.90.3 is using a different rounding mode ... May 11 2003, 12:56 john33 I've just added a 3.93.1 ICL4.5 compile, using... May 11 2003, 14:39 Echizen QUOTE (john33 @ May 11 2003 - 02:39 PM)I... May 11 2003, 15:24 john33 QUOTE (Echizen @ May 11 2003 - 02:24 PM)downl... May 11 2003, 16:02 amano the rounding mode is now more technically "co... May 11 2003, 17:32 ye110man LAME 3.93.1 ICL4.5 using --preset standard -Z: 6,7... May 11 2003, 19:55 amano QUOTE (Echizen @ May 11 2003 - 09:18 AM)Hm...... May 12 2003, 20:56 Dibrom QUOTE (amano @ May 12 2003 - 12:56 PM)QUOTE (... May 12 2003, 21:06 Gabriel I do not remember this statement neither (but I mi... May 13 2003, 09:13 amano hmm. maybe I am completely wrong, this discussion ... May 15 2003, 00:50
amano hmm. poor amano was searching through 1 million po... May 15 2003, 00:52 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 21:28 |
