LAME 3.93.1 vs 3.90.3 |
LAME 3.93.1 vs 3.90.3 |
 May 11 2003, 11:51
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 90 Joined: 27-April 03 Member No.: 6233  |
LAME 3.93.1 using --preset standard -Z: 6,563,619 bytes
LAME 3.90.3 using --alt-preset standard (-Z is default): 6,775,038 bytes why? is there a quality difference? |
 |
 
|
 |
|
May 12 2003, 20:56
Post
#2
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 483 Joined: 1-December 02 Member No.: 3949 |
QUOTE (Echizen @ May 11 2003 - 09:18 AM) Hm... the presets are optimized for 3.90.2 and because of different routines 3.93.1 uses they'll probably result in bad quality. hmm. probability is just a guess, too. formerly gabriel stated that the alt-presets shouldn't be affected by the changes (by design). I don't see, why we shouldn't believe in that, until the contrary is proven. EDIT: Sorry for quoting gabriel in here. as it turned out later in this thread, I was confusing him with another lame dev, namely Alexander Leidinger. This post has been edited by amano: May 15 2003, 01:24 |
|
|
|
ye110man LAME 3.93.1 vs 3.90.3 May 11 2003, 11:51
Gabriel Because 3.90.3 is using a different rounding mode ... May 11 2003, 12:56 john33 I've just added a 3.93.1 ICL4.5 compile, using... May 11 2003, 14:39 Echizen QUOTE (john33 @ May 11 2003 - 02:39 PM)I... May 11 2003, 15:24 john33 QUOTE (Echizen @ May 11 2003 - 02:24 PM)downl... May 11 2003, 16:02 amano the rounding mode is now more technically "co... May 11 2003, 17:32 Echizen QUOTE (amano @ May 11 2003 - 06:32 PM)the rou... May 11 2003, 18:18 ye110man LAME 3.93.1 ICL4.5 using --preset standard -Z: 6,7... May 11 2003, 19:55 Dibrom QUOTE (amano @ May 12 2003 - 12:56 PM)QUOTE (... May 12 2003, 21:06 Gabriel I do not remember this statement neither (but I mi... May 13 2003, 09:13 amano hmm. maybe I am completely wrong, this discussion ... May 15 2003, 00:50
amano hmm. poor amano was searching through 1 million po... May 15 2003, 00:52 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 20:52 |
