Recommend me a lossless codec—looking for a nice compression–to–speed |
Recommend me a lossless codec—looking for a nice compression–to–speed |
Jan 26 2012, 00:15
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 141 Joined: 20-September 11 Member No.: 93842 |
Howdy, people from Hydrogenaudio
As per the topic's title, I am looking for a lossless codec that offers a nice compression (something around Monkey's Audio's High) along with a nice encoding/decoding speed (I am more concerned about the decoding). I initially stumbled upon TAK, which had everything I could ask for, but much to my demise, I found out that the playback of TAK is rather buggy—the official Winamp plug-in does not work well with 24/96 files (even though the TAK format supports high resolutions). Furthermore, I would ideally want the codec to be stable. I would be very grateful to anyone who helps. PS: Before mentioning FLAC, I have to say that I am dissatisfied with the compression it offers, as my storage space is pretty limited (and won't be improving until this summer at earliest). |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jan 26 2012, 14:31
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 141 Joined: 20-September 11 Member No.: 93842 |
Whenever I try to open a file encoded in Monkey's Audio Very High, my CPU needs like 2-3 seconds to start playing back—the same happens with seeking. I don't really like that (I don't like it at all), seeing as I use lossless files for listening purposes as well as for archiving.
|
|
|
|
Jan 26 2012, 15:43
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 943 Joined: 6-September 04 Member No.: 16817 |
Whenever I try to open a file encoded in Monkey's Audio Very High, my CPU needs like 2-3 seconds to start playing back—the same happens with seeking. I don't really like that (I don't like it at all), seeing as I use lossless files for listening purposes as well as for archiving. But that's not necessarily the CPU, slow hard disc drive, fragmented drives, there could be any number of reasons but as others have said it's not the codec. |
|
|
|
Dario Recommend me a lossless codec—looking for a nice compression–to–speed Jan 26 2012, 00:15
Ouroboros FLAC and TAK are within 2% of each other.......
F... Jan 26 2012, 00:40
Dario QUOTE (Ouroboros @ Jan 26 2012, 00:40) FL... Jan 26 2012, 00:50
Soap QUOTE (Dario @ Jan 25 2012, 18:50) I am u... Jan 26 2012, 02:30
washu QUOTE (Dario @ Jan 25 2012, 18:50) I am u... Jan 26 2012, 05:48
Soap If decoding speed is an issue you apparently aren... Jan 26 2012, 00:43
Ouroboros TAK 2.2.0 vs FLAC
Between 1 and 4%...... Jan 26 2012, 01:24
Dario 3–4% is quite a nice amount, at least in my eyes. ... Jan 26 2012, 01:37
shadowking My old Pentium 3-550 could play monkeys normal-hig... Jan 26 2012, 02:46
shadowking You could try wavpack -h or -hh should be close to... Jan 26 2012, 02:52
marc2003 have you tried reporting your problems with TAK pl... Jan 26 2012, 03:01
Porcus SyntheticSoul's speed and compression comparis... Jan 26 2012, 04:07
dhromed QUOTE (Dario @ Jan 26 2012, 14:31) Whenev... Jan 26 2012, 15:53
Porcus Have you set up your player for buffering? Decodin... Jan 26 2012, 19:47
HorsePower73 Try dsfTAKSource: http://liviocavallo.altervista.o... Feb 7 2012, 10:06
n0v!ze For years, I've been using FLAC and only recen... Jul 8 2012, 20:42
db1989 QUOTE (n0v!ze @ Jul 8 2012, 20:42) Fo... Jul 8 2012, 20:48
Porcus QUOTE (n0v!ze @ Jul 8 2012, 21:42) Tr... Jul 8 2012, 21:17
Jan S. Sad to see that noone linked to our own wiki..
h... Jul 9 2012, 10:51
Porcus QUOTE (Jan S. @ Jul 9 2012, 11:51) Sad to... Jul 9 2012, 13:22![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th May 2013 - 12:27 |