New Vinyl and Compression, NOT a vinyl vs digital thread |
New Vinyl and Compression, NOT a vinyl vs digital thread |
Feb 10 2012, 16:55
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 1350 Joined: 4-March 02 From: Indianapolis, IN Member No.: 1440 |
In general... would vinyl versions of recently mastered audio also suffer from over compression? I suppose the answer would change as we worked our way back in time.
I have a decent turntable that isn't being used, and was contemplating getting vinyl versions of things like Metallica's Black Album, and even more recently mastered music if the audio is less "squashed" than the CD version. I found this thread, but it covers a lot more than the one simple aspect I'm asking about. http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....st&p=722028 Edit: grammar This post has been edited by indybrett: Feb 10 2012, 19:56 -------------------- Wait Master, it might be dangerous... you go first.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Feb 11 2012, 00:29
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 3083 Joined: 1-September 05 From: SE Pennsylvania Member No.: 24233 |
Actually it makes MORE sense to use dynamic range compression for an analog medium due to its smaller dynamic range compared to digital.
|
|
|
|
Feb 11 2012, 03:08
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 296 Joined: 5-August 07 Member No.: 45913 |
Actually it makes MORE sense to use dynamic range compression for an analog medium due to its smaller dynamic range compared to digital. Agreed. --- My understanding is that heavily, overly compressed rock music is a byproduct of how FM radio advertising money is distributed: A radio station's ad money is reflected by how many listeners they have, and a squished dynamic range is a trick method of getting a further broadcasting signal. No, it doesn't REALLY increase the range, however people at the very fringe, say 50-60 miles from the tower, can easily hear the sound over the then elevated (background) noise floor of FM transmission at that range, whereas that exact same elevated noise floor from a similar station broadcasting on top of a song that has a lower average loudness, will seem hissy, objectionable, and make one change the station looking for a new song! The radio station which can prove they have 500,000 listeners during the morning commute gets a lot more advertising money than the station which can only document they have 300,000 listeners. Although they all probably routinely compress on their own, as well, the music which comes to them pre-compressed by a recording engineer who didn't simply dial in a generic and fixed amount of compression, like the station's sound room ONLY can, but instead used a variable amount per song, where they engineer could tweak the results after comparing several tested versions, wins. This post has been edited by mzil: Feb 11 2012, 03:11 |
|
|
|
indybrett New Vinyl and Compression Feb 10 2012, 16:55
mixminus1 "It depends."
Of the handful of new(er... Feb 10 2012, 18:01
indybrett QUOTE (mixminus1 @ Feb 10 2012, 12:01) mo... Feb 10 2012, 21:02
MichaelW I guess that's what you'd expect with mode... Feb 10 2012, 23:30
indybrett I was hoping that the massive amounts of compressi... Feb 10 2012, 23:42
Porcus QUOTE (mzil @ Feb 11 2012, 03:08) My unde... Feb 11 2012, 15:44
indybrett I thought I remembered reading something in the pa... Feb 11 2012, 00:36
indybrett I'd always heard that it was because louder wi... Feb 11 2012, 04:00
slks All the vinyl albums of newer music I have (pressi... Feb 11 2012, 11:49
slks Radio isn't the only reason, in fact it's ... Feb 13 2012, 01:39
dumdidum QUOTE (slks @ Feb 13 2012, 01:39) When pe... Feb 13 2012, 08:50
indybrett Getting back on topic...
Does anybody know of a ... Feb 13 2012, 14:17![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 12:01 |