"reference libFLAC 1.2.1 win64 20080709" and Flac 64-bits, What does this version number mean? How to compile flac for x64? |
![]() ![]() |
"reference libFLAC 1.2.1 win64 20080709" and Flac 64-bits, What does this version number mean? How to compile flac for x64? |
Feb 18 2012, 17:30
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 7 Joined: 5-February 12 Member No.: 96948 |
Hello everyone
As I was browsing my flac library in foobar, I noticed that an album had an unusual decoder version displayed under the "encoder" column, "reference libFLAC 1.2.1 win64 20080709", while most of the others have "reference libFLAC 1.2.1 20070917" or previous "official" releases (from binaries corresponding to the ones marked on the sourceforge site of FLAC (changelog)). This album was given to me by a friend. A quick research on Google returned links mostly to torrent sites, which were offering albums encoded with this special version (not "purposefully": mediaInfo would actually bring the encoder info up in the nfo file attached on the presentation page). I was wondering what was hiding behind this reference, specially user-built binaries, or an unreferenced version,...? Also, what reliability may I give to this encode/encoder? After trying to dig the question a bit more, I found that actually 64-bits binaries weren't that easy to find (euphemism), because these specials were expected to be built case by case for the specific user needs (SSE2, SSE3...); I'm currently running some tests with x64 encoders but I have no basic knowledge in compiling at all. I'm trying to get a hand on it with oggenc and lame sources plus some info given in this HA thread, but as I'm really only a self learner in computer matters it's not improving quickly... I hope I made myself clear, any info would be more than welcome :-) Thanks reason for edit: typo + new info This post has been edited by Isayama: Feb 18 2012, 17:56 |
|
|
|
Feb 18 2012, 17:57
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Developer Posts: 2977 Joined: 2-December 07 Member No.: 49183 |
QUOTE Why is that flac x64 binaries are not considered so useful that they'd be so difficult to find? http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....st&p=777401 This post has been edited by lvqcl: Feb 18 2012, 17:59 |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th May 2013 - 12:14 |