Dual Disc vs CDDA |
Dual Disc vs CDDA |
Feb 29 2012, 17:28
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 30-November 09 From: Qhahog, RI Member No.: 75431 |
I bought a dual disc a while back, and recently I just got around to listening to the DVD side. I was surprised to find out the audio on the DVD side was only 192kbps 48Khz AC3 audio. The 53 minutes of AC3 audio in only about 73MB. Is this actually supposed to sound better than the CD audio side of the disc?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Jun 5 2012, 23:49
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 353 Joined: 31-March 06 From: Houston, Texas Member No.: 29046 |
I had bought a DualDisc once, David Bowie's "Reality".
I was disappointed to find that, despite the marketing hype, there wasn't any DVD-A audio (which would be indicated by an AUDIO_TS directory on the disc). I suppose some DualDisc releases had high-rez DVD-A audio, but the album I bought didn't, and apparently not yours either. What mine did have was a standard "DVD player" DVD (VIDEO_TS folder). There was one "program" that had 16/48 stereo PCM with title cards for the songs, and a second program that had a short film set to the music in 5.1 48k AC3. The 5.1 mix was disappointing too, by the way. If I hadn't known it was surround, I may have mistook it for the stereo mix. I'd compare it more to stereo that's been upmixed, than something that truly utilizes all the channels, like the quadraphonic Dark Side of the Moon, or The Flaming Lips' 5.1 releases. No wonder the format failed... -------------------- http://www.last.fm/user/sls/
|
|
|
|
Replica9000 Dual Disc vs CDDA Feb 29 2012, 17:28
DVDdoug It might sound "better" if it's 5.1 ... Feb 29 2012, 19:23
GeSomeone No, the Dolby Digital (AC3) won't sound better... Mar 5 2012, 11:16![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th June 2013 - 22:17 |