Dither—my explanation of how it keeps details below quantization level, Was: "Dither" (TOS #6) |
Dither—my explanation of how it keeps details below quantization level, Was: "Dither" (TOS #6) |
Mar 7 2012, 13:22
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 63 Joined: 21-January 09 From: UK Member No.: 65825 |
To help with the understanding of dither, I am posting an explanation, of how signal details smaller than the quantization level are retained, after quantization, when Dither Noise is added to the source material.
A small signal detail with height less than the quantization level, and centred half way between two quantization steps, is too small to cross a quantization step. It is lost when the waveform is quantized. With a Dither Noise waveform added, the height of the two waveforms summed is occasionally greater than the quantization level. At these occasional points the waveform crosses a quantization step. So now when this waveform is quantized, although the result is noisy, the shape of the original signal detail is retained. Discussion invited. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Mar 7 2012, 16:10
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 63 Joined: 21-January 09 From: UK Member No.: 65825 |
icstm - Thanks
pdq - true, that is another function of dither. Frequently flipping the LSB by the sum of the small signal and the dither noise retaines the correct shape. |
|
|
|
KMD Dither—my explanation of how it keeps details below quantization level Mar 7 2012, 13:22
icstm QUOTE (KMD @ Mar 7 2012, 12:22) To help w... Mar 7 2012, 13:29
pdq You might add that even when that small signal DOE... Mar 7 2012, 15:07
Paulhoff QUOTE (pdq @ Mar 7 2012, 10:07) You might... Mar 8 2012, 19:03
icstm Spatial dither:
In a video feed spatial dither can... Mar 7 2012, 17:43
mjb2006 Please do what you can to improve our wiki article... Mar 7 2012, 21:43
Notat QUOTE (mjb2006 @ Mar 7 2012, 14:43) Pleas... Mar 22 2012, 15:38
NullC I highly recommend the first few sections of this ... Mar 8 2012, 17:39
icstm QUOTE (NullC @ Mar 8 2012, 16:39) I highl... Mar 9 2012, 16:14
KMD Paulhoff - You were probably getting the benefi... Mar 8 2012, 19:12
KMD NullC - If you put fig 2.4, 2.5 ,2.11, 4.6 in... Mar 8 2012, 19:15
KMD Reference for this subject. Paper titled,
... Mar 8 2012, 20:05
KMD mjb2006 - Will do Mar 9 2012, 15:24
greynol In light of the recent conversation over the quant... Mar 21 2012, 21:14
mjb2006 QUOTE (greynol @ Mar 21 2012, 14:14) Afte... Mar 22 2012, 01:57
saratoga Obviously someone who doesn't understand sampl... Mar 22 2012, 02:05
benski I remember the first lab in University Physics cla... Mar 21 2012, 21:42
2Bdecided Important points:
Dither removes the potentially ... Mar 22 2012, 11:38
alanofoz Warning: very shallow & not very scientific:
... Mar 22 2012, 12:05![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 23:31 |