Dither—my explanation of how it keeps details below quantization level, Was: "Dither" (TOS #6) |
Dither—my explanation of how it keeps details below quantization level, Was: "Dither" (TOS #6) |
Mar 7 2012, 13:22
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 63 Joined: 21-January 09 From: UK Member No.: 65825 |
To help with the understanding of dither, I am posting an explanation, of how signal details smaller than the quantization level are retained, after quantization, when Dither Noise is added to the source material.
A small signal detail with height less than the quantization level, and centred half way between two quantization steps, is too small to cross a quantization step. It is lost when the waveform is quantized. With a Dither Noise waveform added, the height of the two waveforms summed is occasionally greater than the quantization level. At these occasional points the waveform crosses a quantization step. So now when this waveform is quantized, although the result is noisy, the shape of the original signal detail is retained. Discussion invited. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Mar 8 2012, 17:39
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Developer Posts: 191 Joined: 8-July 03 Member No.: 7653 |
I highly recommend the first few sections of this thesis for a careful technical explanation of how dither works and why it's important. It starts with the sampling theorem, shows how quantization breaks it, then shows how dither (of the right kind) fixes the breakage. It's well worth the read, even though the latter parts are dealing with image processing rather than audio. |
|
|
|
KMD Dither—my explanation of how it keeps details below quantization level Mar 7 2012, 13:22
icstm QUOTE (KMD @ Mar 7 2012, 12:22) To help w... Mar 7 2012, 13:29
pdq You might add that even when that small signal DOE... Mar 7 2012, 15:07
Paulhoff QUOTE (pdq @ Mar 7 2012, 10:07) You might... Mar 8 2012, 19:03
KMD icstm - Thanks
pdq - true, that is another funct... Mar 7 2012, 16:10
icstm Spatial dither:
In a video feed spatial dither can... Mar 7 2012, 17:43
mjb2006 Please do what you can to improve our wiki article... Mar 7 2012, 21:43
Notat QUOTE (mjb2006 @ Mar 7 2012, 14:43) Pleas... Mar 22 2012, 15:38
icstm QUOTE (NullC @ Mar 8 2012, 16:39) I highl... Mar 9 2012, 16:14
KMD Paulhoff - You were probably getting the benefi... Mar 8 2012, 19:12
KMD NullC - If you put fig 2.4, 2.5 ,2.11, 4.6 in... Mar 8 2012, 19:15
KMD Reference for this subject. Paper titled,
... Mar 8 2012, 20:05
KMD mjb2006 - Will do Mar 9 2012, 15:24
greynol In light of the recent conversation over the quant... Mar 21 2012, 21:14
mjb2006 QUOTE (greynol @ Mar 21 2012, 14:14) Afte... Mar 22 2012, 01:57
saratoga Obviously someone who doesn't understand sampl... Mar 22 2012, 02:05
benski I remember the first lab in University Physics cla... Mar 21 2012, 21:42
2Bdecided Important points:
Dither removes the potentially ... Mar 22 2012, 11:38
alanofoz Warning: very shallow & not very scientific:
... Mar 22 2012, 12:05![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th May 2013 - 21:28 |