IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Hydrogenaudio Forum Rules

- No Warez. This includes warez links, cracks and/or requests for help in getting illegal software or copyrighted music tracks!
- No Spamming or Trolling on the boards, this includes useless posts, trying to only increase post count or trying to deliberately create a flame war.
- No Hateful or Disrespectful posts. This includes: bashing, name-calling or insults directed at a board member.
- Click here for complete Hydrogenaudio Terms of Service

[TOS #8,#12] From: ...no point to distributing music in 24 bit/192 kHz, From Topic ID: 93853
forart.eu
post Mar 15 2012, 08:17
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 74
Joined: 10-December 09
From: italy
Member No.: 75798



Just a note: it has been scientifically proven that sounds are not perceived only through ears...

Anyway, in our case, bit depth is *mutch* more important than frequency IMHO.

This post has been edited by forart.eu: Mar 15 2012, 08:19
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
forart.eu
post Mar 15 2012, 09:01
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 74
Joined: 10-December 09
From: italy
Member No.: 75798



QUOTE (bandpass @ Mar 15 2012, 08:40) *
I don't think it matters—when you're sitting in front of the speakers, doing an ABX test, you can use any organ of your body you like to help make the determination (you might want to lock the door first though).

Well, in this perspective lossless is useless if you can't ABX lossy... blink.gif

No, ABX isn't the unique method to evaluate sound quality, IMHO.

BTW just think about low frequency effect on your floor (then to your feets): even if your ears hear certain frequencies, the listening experience wouldn't be the same if the floor would not vibrate. wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2014 - 15:55