[TOS #8,#12] From: ...no point to distributing music in 24 bit/192 kHz, From Topic ID: 93853 Options

[forart.eu]

Just a note: it has been scientifically proven that sounds are not perceived only through ears...

Anyway, in our case, bit depth is *mutch* more important than frequency IMHO.

This post has been edited by forart.eu: Mar 15 2012, 08:19

[forart.eu]

Do you remember the 10th of December 2009? It was the day you joined the wrong forum.

For your knowledge, i joined this forum before you on 2nd October 2001 mate.

Seriously, it's pretty trivial to ABX the feeling of the floor vibrating beneath your feet as you play a deep bass line.

It was just an example.

So you're substantially claiming that non-ABXable lossy-encoded sound is equal to a lossless one ?

If true, than what's the meaning of lossless encoders ?


BTW - once again - my position is that we don't need more Hz, but we need more bits !



This post has been edited by forart.eu: Mar 15 2012, 14:37

[matt the cat]

http://www.joelstrait.com/blog/2009/10/12/..._per_sample.png

Wasnt it explained by xiphmont why thinking like this is wrong?

Edit: Got ninja'd

This post has been edited by db1989: Mar 15 2012, 20:33

Reason for edit: demoting image to link