[TOS #8,#12] From: ...no point to distributing music in 24 bit/192 kHz, From Topic ID: 93853 |
Hydrogenaudio Forum Rules - No Warez. This includes warez links, cracks and/or requests for help in getting illegal software or copyrighted music tracks!
- No Spamming or Trolling on the boards, this includes useless posts, trying to only increase post count or trying to deliberately create a flame war.
- No Hateful or Disrespectful posts. This includes: bashing, name-calling or insults directed at a board member.
- Click here for complete Hydrogenaudio Terms of Service
[TOS #8,#12] From: ...no point to distributing music in 24 bit/192 kHz, From Topic ID: 93853 |
  Mar 15 2012, 08:17
Post
#1
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 74 Joined: 10-December 09 From: italy Member No.: 75798  |
Just a note: it has been scientifically proven that sounds are not perceived only through ears...
Anyway, in our case, bit depth is *mutch* more important than frequency IMHO. This post has been edited by forart.eu: Mar 15 2012, 08:19 |
 |
 
|
 |
 Mar 15 2012, 14:25
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 74 Joined: 10-December 09 From: italy Member No.: 75798 |
QUOTE (2Bdecided @ Mar 15 2012, 10:46)  Do you remember the 10th of December 2009? It was the day you joined the wrong forum.  For your knowledge, i joined this forum before you on 2nd October 2001 mate.  QUOTE (2Bdecided @ Mar 15 2012, 10:46) Seriously, it's pretty trivial to ABX the feeling of the floor vibrating beneath your feet as you play a deep bass line. It was just an example. So you're substantially claiming that non-ABXable lossy-encoded sound is equal to a lossless one ? If true, than what's the meaning of lossless encoders ? BTW - once again - my position is that we don't need more Hz, but we need more bits ! 
This post has been edited by forart.eu: Mar 15 2012, 14:37 |
|
|
|
|
Mar 15 2012, 15:26
Post
#3
|
|
 Group: Super Moderator Posts: 3268 Joined: 26-July 02 From: princegeorge.ca Member No.: 2796 |
QUOTE (forart.eu @ Mar 15 2012, 05:25) The fact that you're posting this image proves that you did not read the article. Linear interpolation is not how the signal is reconstructed.
This post has been edited by db1989: Mar 15 2012, 20:32
Reason for edit: as above
-------------------- (atrix|(fb2k->e-mu 0404 usb|audio 8 dj))->hd280|jvc ha-fx35-b
|
|
|
|
forart.eu [TOS #8,#12] From: ...no point to distributing music in 24 bit/192 kHz Mar 15 2012, 08:17
bandpass QUOTE (forart.eu @ Mar 15 2012, 07:17) Ju... Mar 15 2012, 08:40 forart.eu QUOTE (bandpass @ Mar 15 2012, 08:40) I d... Mar 15 2012, 09:01
2Bdecided QUOTE (forart.eu @ Mar 15 2012, 08:01) No... Mar 15 2012, 10:46 greynol Ok, I'll bite. Where is your scientific ... Mar 15 2012, 09:19 forart.eu 16/44 *is* sufficient, but 32/44 (or 48) would be ... Mar 15 2012, 10:04 Martel Certain percentage of customers clearly aren't... Mar 15 2012, 10:07 bug80 QUOTE (forart.eu @ Mar 15 2012, 14:25) BT... Mar 15 2012, 14:40 matt the cat QUOTE (forart.eu @ Mar 15 2012, 15:25) ht... Mar 15 2012, 14:42 probedb QUOTE (forart.eu @ Mar 15 2012, 13:25) QU... Mar 15 2012, 14:50 Porcus QUOTE (forart.eu @ Mar 15 2012, 14:25) my... Mar 15 2012, 15:01 skamp QUOTE (forart.eu @ Mar 15 2012, 14:25) Fo... Mar 15 2012, 15:18 Porcus QUOTE (skamp @ Mar 15 2012, 15:18) Increa... Mar 15 2012, 15:46 SebastianG QUOTE (forart.eu @ Mar 15 2012, 14:25) BT... Mar 15 2012, 15:23 Martel Now do these pictures for 16 vs. 24 bit. Mar 15 2012, 14:56 dhromed Photoshop won't let me create an image with 2^... Mar 15 2012, 15:01 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 16:12 |
