Lame 3.99 -V2 regression? |
Lame 3.99 -V2 regression? |
 Mar 16 2012, 21:28
Post
#1
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 60 Joined: 24-September 03 Member No.: 8994  |
Hi to all. In the last version of Lame 3.99.5 the -V2 switch produce a lower bitrate than the Lame 3.98 version. In a metal song the bitrate can be a lot different, about a ~30-40 kbps.
¿There's a regression con -V2 switch or it's me? The resulting files enconded with 3.99.5 can be easy ABX with the original source, and I have a lot of problems to distinguish the 3.98 encode. PD: Sorry for my english, I'm good read to it but bad to write in. -------------------- Living forevermore, leaving today, back to my place, I've got: Nothing to say!
|
 |
 
|
 |
|
Mar 16 2012, 21:40
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 675 Joined: 23-February 05 Member No.: 20097 |
Please post the ABX logs showing the results of your test.
Also, a shorter-than-30 second sample (of the original track, and preferably as FLAC) containing the part you were able to ABX would be helpful so that others could try to reproduce your results. You can post that in the "Uploads" section. -------------------- "Not sure what the question is, but the answer is probably no."
|
|
|
|
chichazor Lame 3.99 -V2 regression? Mar 16 2012, 21:28
Emiliano55 I noticed that too. 3.99.5 seems to have lower bit... May 27 2012, 00:23 JJZolx Well, there wouldn't be much point in releasin... May 27 2012, 01:37 shadowking The lowered bitrate is related to SFB21 bug fixes.... May 27 2012, 09:58 Emiliano55 Well, I only noticed lower bitrates on the only tw... May 28 2012, 00:45
goldyn chyld I've also noticed lower bitrates on several hi... May 28 2012, 10:11 Kohlrabi QUOTE (goldyn chyld @ May 28 2012, 11:11)... May 28 2012, 10:49 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th May 2013 - 01:50 |
