Rolling Stone Hi-res releases, not news, but funny |
Rolling Stone Hi-res releases, not news, but funny |
 Mar 23 2012, 15:00
Post
#1
|
|
 ReplayGain developer Group: Developer Posts: 4583 Joined: 5-November 01 From: Yorkshire, UK Member No.: 409  |
Roll up, roll up, get your Rolling Stones 24-bit 88.2kHz downloads here...
https://www.hdtracks.com/index.php?file=cat...D00018771886723 ...what? Quality not good enough for you sir? Pay an extra $10 for the 24-bit 176.4kHZ version here... https://www.hdtracks.com/index.php?file=cat...X00018771886723 ...and hear those 1964 recordings in all their, er, glory. (Play the previews if you don't understand why this is so funny). Cheers, David. P.S. No flames please. I think some of the music is great, and this may well be the best digital release of it - but 176.4kHz for this?! |
 |
 
|
2Bdecided Rolling Stone Hi-res releases Mar 23 2012, 15:00
benski I demand a high enough sample rate to be able to h... Mar 23 2012, 16:28 pdq That's an interestinmg point. Shouldn't yo... Mar 23 2012, 17:20
D. Lundberg QUOTE (pdq @ Mar 23 2012, 17:20) That... Mar 23 2012, 17:44
Arnold B. Krueger QUOTE (pdq @ Mar 23 2012, 12:20) That... Mar 23 2012, 22:36 greynol Well if it makes Neil Young's ears happy... Mar 23 2012, 17:41 greynol Nearly 110 db down at 20kHz. Those images really t... Mar 23 2012, 17:50 Porcus QUOTE (greynol @ Mar 23 2012, 17:50) Near... Mar 23 2012, 18:51 greynol QUOTE (Porcus @ Mar 23 2012, 10:51) Nah, ... Mar 23 2012, 19:21 Kohlrabi I didn't do so before, but now I added HDTrack... Mar 23 2012, 17:51 2Bdecided QUOTE (Kohlrabi @ Mar 23 2012, 16:51) I d... Mar 23 2012, 19:12 Ron Jones I wouldn't have bought it if they hadn't u... Mar 23 2012, 18:04  |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 02:47 |
