New AccurateRip CD Drive Accuracy List for 2012 |
New AccurateRip CD Drive Accuracy List for 2012 |
Mar 24 2012, 17:27
Post
#1
|
|
|
dBpowerAMP developer Group: Developer (Donating) Posts: 2653 Joined: 24-March 02 Member No.: 1615 |
-------------------- Spoon http://www.dbpoweramp.com
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Mar 24 2012, 19:04
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 25 Joined: 14-February 12 Member No.: 97152 |
The winner doesn't surprise me. From my experience, drives based on Matshita/Panasonic (+102 in Accuraterip's list) chipset have superb error correction and good interpolation capabilites. I have a pair of badly pressed CD, very, very hard to rip properly in a lot of drives (Tested in drives based on Renesas, Mediatek, NEC). However, ripping such CDs is a piece of cake in a old Hitachi-LG slim DVD-ROM based on Panasonic chipset.
|
|
|
|
Mar 24 2012, 20:43
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1471 Joined: 30-November 06 Member No.: 38207 |
New sheriff in town?
Notably, Matshita has three drives in top 7. UJ-812, 852 and 85J. Are they technically the same? and good interpolation capabilites That wouldn't help the AccurateRip statistics. Besides, since interpolation occurs when music is actually missing, it is hard to improve over naive averaging. However, interpolation artifacts may be less audible (or less annoying) simply because there is more correct to begin with, and less guesswork to do, and I would put my money on that explanation. -------------------- geocities.com/hydrogenaudio: http://goo.gl/tqYZj
|
|
|
|
spoon New AccurateRip CD Drive Accuracy List for 2012 Mar 24 2012, 17:27
skamp QUOTE Joined: 24-March 02
10 years to the day, eh? Mar 24 2012, 18:01
spoon QUOTE (skamp @ Mar 24 2012, 18:01) QUOTE ... Mar 25 2012, 23:16
pablogm123 You are right. That feature has nothing to do with... Mar 24 2012, 20:56
Andavari The worst being Optiarc doesn't really surpris... Mar 26 2012, 21:17![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 11:55 |