The DR Analysis of Tracks / Image don't match, was: "Weirdest Thing Ever" |
The DR Analysis of Tracks / Image don't match, was: "Weirdest Thing Ever" |
Mar 31 2012, 03:28
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 30-March 12 Member No.: 98220 |
First, let me introduce myself, as I've been lurking around the forum before, but never get registered until now
I'm guess I'm sorry for that. Anyway, this is the matter... I have a 16-track album in FLAC format and I decided to make a DR analysis of them (like I always do, since I have around 300+ FLAC albums). QUOTE Software used: Foobar2000 1.1.11 Dynamic Range Meter 1.1.1 CUETools 2.1.2a FLAC: libFLAC 1.2.1 (UTC 2007-09-17) So, I drag-and-drop the tracks into Foobar playlist, right click over the playlist > Contents > Dynamic Range Meter At the end, Foobar displayed the following window: ![]() ...and the following log: CODE foobar2000 1.1.11 / Dynamic Range Meter 1.1.1 log date: 2012-03-30 9:55:54 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analyzed: Album -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DR Peak RMS Duration Track -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DR12 -2.28 dB -17.67 dB 1:36 01-Track 01 DR4 -0.21 dB -6.37 dB 5:56 02-Track 02 DR5 -0.20 dB -9.40 dB 1:19 03-Track 03 DR4 -0.21 dB -5.34 dB 4:24 04-Track 04 DR11 -0.33 dB -15.82 dB 1:01 05-Track 05 DR3 -0.21 dB -5.66 dB 4:52 06-Track 06 DR6 -0.20 dB -8.42 dB 5:15 07-Track 07 DR15 -1.19 dB -19.38 dB 1:48 08-Track 08 DR4 -0.20 dB -6.89 dB 3:37 09-Track 09 DR11 -3.22 dB -25.33 dB 3:59 10-Track 10 DR9 -1.24 dB -17.72 dB 1:01 11-Track 11 DR5 -0.20 dB -6.47 dB 4:40 12-Track 12 DR12 -0.20 dB -16.67 dB 2:48 13-Track 13 DR12 -0.21 dB -18.80 dB 0:46 14-Track 14 DR4 -0.21 dB -6.11 dB 3:32 15-Track 15 DR8 -0.21 dB -14.49 dB 8:20 16-Track 16 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of tracks: 16 Official DR value: DR8 Samplerate: 44100 Hz Channels: 2 Bits per sample: 16 Bitrate: 482 kbps Codec: FLAC ================================================================================ (the tracks with high DR value are just intros, spoken parts, skits, interludes, etc...) Then, with the CUE + FLAC tracks, I made a WAV Image using CUE Tools. After finished, just to check I run a DR analysis again... with very strange results. After finished, Foobar displayed the following window: ![]() ...and the following log: CODE foobar2000 1.1.11 / Dynamic Range Meter 1.1.1 log date: 2012-03-30 10:10:51 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Statistics for: ?-Image Number of samples: 145233060 Duration: 54:53 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Left Right Peak Value: -0.20 dB --- -0.20 dB Avg RMS: -8.04 dB --- -8.65 dB DR channel: 4.00 dB --- 4.56 dB -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Official DR Value: DR4 Samplerate: 44100 Hz Channels: 2 Bits per sample: 16 Bitrate: 1411 kbps Codec: PCM ================================================================================ What the heck... So I run a RG scan. First from the FLACK tracks: (yes, the album suffer from Loudness War) ...and then another from the WAV Image: Same loudness. So definitely there's no kind of limiting whatsoever: both sounds and (clearly) are, without a doubt, the same. Just to be clear, in case some track(s) were repeated or missing during analysis, I did this like four times,... same results. This actually happened yesterday, so I thought maybe it could something that might get fixed when restaring the PC or something. I came today and got the same results. Besides, I updated Foobat long ago (weeks, maybe over and month), any problems so far, so it's discarded. Frankly, it's the first time I have no clue what's going on. I hope you guys can help to find the answer. Greetings. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Mar 31 2012, 12:12
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 306 Joined: 2-July 10 Member No.: 81991 |
This might have something to do with the "Grouping" option of foo_dynamic_range. Try checking all the boxes.
|
|
|
|
Tormanoid The DR Analysis of Tracks / Image don't match Mar 31 2012, 03:28
mjb2006 I would use the developer's feedback form at h... Mar 31 2012, 07:52
Dakeryas I don't think there are any problems, you are ... Apr 2 2012, 17:44![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 19:42 |