IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Hydrogenaudio Forum Rules

- No Warez. This includes warez links, cracks and/or requests for help in getting illegal software or copyrighted music tracks!
- No Spamming or Trolling on the boards, this includes useless posts, trying to only increase post count or trying to deliberately create a flame war.
- No Hateful or Disrespectful posts. This includes: bashing, name-calling or insults directed at a board member.
- Click here for complete Hydrogenaudio Terms of Service

[TOS #8] From: which lame version?, From Topic ID: 94257
pdq
post Mar 30 2012, 19:23
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 3305
Joined: 1-September 05
From: SE Pennsylvania
Member No.: 24233



Gogo is well known for being very fast, but can you point to any listening test results that support your claim for it being "best quality"?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
vishal8
post Mar 31 2012, 03:26
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 29-March 12
Member No.: 98184



QUOTE (pdq @ Mar 30 2012, 23:53) *
Gogo is well known for being very fast, but can you point to any listening test results that support your claim for it being "best quality"?


so which version of lame from past till present is best

also suggest me which lame is thouroughly tested till today and recommended

cbr= which lame version is best? and switch?
vbr = which lame version is best? and switch?

i saw doom9 pforum in which fhg was superior to lame 2011

i mainly convert from flac to mp3
i want transparency to my ear cause i can detect difference between lame v0 and original
original has more rich sound and width while lame has less rich sound and seems like it is cutted at some point, i mean fiedility sound perception width or richness.
if you go by your mind when listening you can hear it but if you go by your heart then i can't distinguish but feels something is misssing which feels bad
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lvqcl
post Mar 31 2012, 08:14
Post #3





Group: Developer
Posts: 3212
Joined: 2-December 07
Member No.: 49183



QUOTE
i mean fiedility sound perception width or richness


From http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil...ml#toc_cbtpeadb :

QUOTE
In any test where a listener can tell two choices apart via any means apart from listening, the results will usually be what the listener expected in advance; this is called confirmation bias and it's similar to the placebo effect. It means people 'hear' differences because of subconscious cues and preferences that have nothing to do with the audio, like preferring a more expensive (or more attractive) amplifier over a cheaper option.
[...]
ABX is considered a minimum bar for a listening test to be meaningful; reputable audio forums such as Hydrogen Audio often do not even allow discussion of listening results unless they meet this minimum objectivity requirement.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th April 2014 - 09:32