AAC True VBR vs. VBR?, XLD's AAC True VBR or iTunes' AAC VBR |
AAC True VBR vs. VBR?, XLD's AAC True VBR or iTunes' AAC VBR |
Apr 20 2012, 11:56
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 20-April 12 Member No.: 99022 |
I'm using Mac and I want the best quality available when using AAC @320 kbps.
Should I use XLD's True VBR or iTunes' VBR? Help! /Thanks! This post has been edited by Dataz: Apr 20 2012, 12:15 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Apr 27 2012, 20:06
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 8 Joined: 3-March 12 Member No.: 97532 |
IMHO, Just forget about that debate.
To the point op asking, I'd say true VBR at around 256 kbps. Actual Bit rate will go even higher when needed, it's very flexible. IMO 192 kbps is already great. This post has been edited by pururin: Apr 27 2012, 20:08 |
|
|
|
Dataz AAC True VBR vs. VBR? Apr 20 2012, 11:56
Ouroboros 320 kbit/s is CBR, not VBR.
So, which do you want... Apr 20 2012, 12:33
IgorC QUOTE (Ouroboros @ Apr 20 2012, 08:33) 32... Apr 20 2012, 14:08
Ouroboros Yes, all of that is true, but 320-350 kbit/s VBR i... Apr 20 2012, 15:11
IgorC OP talks about two different VBR modes. He doesn... Apr 20 2012, 15:50
Ouroboros Perhaps requoting the OP might refresh your memory... Apr 20 2012, 15:56
IgorC The point is that Apple AAC encoder has constraine... Apr 20 2012, 16:22
Ouroboros Yes, I know that Apple AAC and iTunes have a const... Apr 20 2012, 16:51![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th May 2013 - 07:44 |