AAC True VBR vs. VBR?, XLD's AAC True VBR or iTunes' AAC VBR |
AAC True VBR vs. VBR?, XLD's AAC True VBR or iTunes' AAC VBR |
Apr 20 2012, 11:56
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 20-April 12 Member No.: 99022 |
I'm using Mac and I want the best quality available when using AAC @320 kbps.
Should I use XLD's True VBR or iTunes' VBR? Help! /Thanks! This post has been edited by Dataz: Apr 20 2012, 12:15 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Apr 20 2012, 15:56
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 260 Joined: 30-May 08 From: UK Member No.: 53927 |
Perhaps requoting the OP might refresh your memory.....
I'm using Mac and I want the best quality available when using AAC @320 kbps. That's a fixed bit rate, hence CBR. He then goes on to ask about which VBR codec to use, and that's a contradiction (CBR=/=VBR), hence I asked him which he meant - 320 CBR, or VBR.
|
|
|
|
Dataz AAC True VBR vs. VBR? Apr 20 2012, 11:56
Ouroboros 320 kbit/s is CBR, not VBR.
So, which do you want... Apr 20 2012, 12:33
IgorC QUOTE (Ouroboros @ Apr 20 2012, 08:33) 32... Apr 20 2012, 14:08
Ouroboros Yes, all of that is true, but 320-350 kbit/s VBR i... Apr 20 2012, 15:11
IgorC OP talks about two different VBR modes. He doesn... Apr 20 2012, 15:50
IgorC The point is that Apple AAC encoder has constraine... Apr 20 2012, 16:22
Ouroboros Yes, I know that Apple AAC and iTunes have a const... Apr 20 2012, 16:51
pururin IMHO, Just forget about that debate.
To the point... Apr 27 2012, 20:06![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 16:37 |