Should I go with CBR or VBR(0) for my mp3's? |
Should I go with CBR or VBR(0) for my mp3's? |
May 3 2012, 03:35
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 15 Joined: 3-May 12 Member No.: 99436 |
Hi all, new to the forums. I had asked this question elsewhere and was told this is the best place to ask.
I'm currently in the process of re-converting my cd library into mp3's on my computer. Ultimately I'd like to get the best (lossy) sound quality I can get...and was originally planning to go with 320 CBR but I'm now reading a lot about VBR v-0 and how it's basically equivalent with an impossible to notice difference between the 2. I'm not concerned about space on my computer hard drive but I do plan on loading up these mp3's to my iPhone (where space can get scarce). I just converted 2 FLAC files and noticed a 1.5 mb difference between the 2, but as far as I can tell, no real degradation in sound quality. Id just like to get some thoughts on this. I'm certainly no expert on the subject of sound science. To be honest, I'm not an audiophile at all...but at the same time, I want to "future proof" myself so that I never do realize (like I did this time around) that I'd like to upgrade my library (upgraded my headphones and started noticing a difference in quality of some mp3's). Is there any reason why I may regret going with vbr v-0 over cbr or will I thank myself for saving the space? I figure that if some of the professionals on here cannot notice a difference then there is no chance I ever will. http://i50.tinypic.com/2z9e7u9.jpg This post has been edited by db1989: May 3 2012, 07:36
Reason for edit: TOS #6: not an MP3 tech issue / TOS #5: post completely different topics to their own threads
|
|
|
|
DaGrandMastah Should I go with CBR or VBR(0) for my mp3's? May 3 2012, 03:35
eahm 1) You will regret it if you don't save them i... May 3 2012, 04:23
Erich_2 cbr versus V0 May 3 2012, 11:17
twostar I recommend ripping to ALAC. Itunes could then con... May 3 2012, 11:22
LosMintos QUOTE (DaGrandMastah @ May 3 2012, 04:35)... May 3 2012, 12:33
DVDdoug QUOTE I just converted 2 FLAC files and noticed a ... May 3 2012, 18:06
shadowking IMO you should take time to find out what is accep... May 4 2012, 01:33
shadowking I will add that if you really need to go with high... May 4 2012, 04:57
antman QUOTE (shadowking @ May 3 2012, 19:33) IM... May 13 2012, 15:17
timcupery QUOTE (antman @ May 13 2012, 10:17) ABX J... Jul 5 2012, 17:43
eahm Reading my comment up there, I can't believe I... Jul 5 2012, 17:59
halb27 It's fine to use moderate bitrate because qual... Jul 5 2012, 21:45
yourlord If one of the reasons for using "needlessly... Jul 5 2012, 22:10
halb27 Yes, lossless is the way to go, no doubt after rip... Jul 5 2012, 22:37
AshenTech I agree on the "go lossless" thing, Its ... Jul 6 2012, 02:49
RobertoDomenico If you're planing to use Lame encoded mp3... Jul 6 2012, 03:12
Canar 320 and V0 are total overkill. I've heard the ... Jul 6 2012, 04:30
rhfrjpfdh hello to all
i'm interested in the question (l... Sep 3 2012, 12:37
Kohlrabi QUOTE (rhfrjpfdh @ Sep 3 2012, 13:37) i... Sep 3 2012, 13:20
halb27 QUOTE (Kohlrabi @ Sep 3 2012, 14:20) Usin... Sep 3 2012, 16:38
Dynamic QUOTE (halb27 @ Sep 3 2012, 16:38) QUOTE ... Sep 3 2012, 17:22
halb27 QUOTE (Dynamic @ Sep 3 2012, 18:22) ... b... Sep 3 2012, 18:51
halb27 An actual post gives another sample that shows tha... Sep 6 2012, 07:45
Dynamic Thanks for the Angel Falls link, halb27. I ABXed t... Sep 6 2012, 19:48
halb27 You are right in assuming I don't care about t... Sep 6 2012, 20:43![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 04:57 |