HE AAC Audio Quality & Tuning |
HE AAC Audio Quality & Tuning |
May 23 2012, 15:39
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 7 Joined: 23-May 12 Member No.: 100087 |
I am new to the lossy coding world. I recently became a DROID owner and, in an effort to get down to carrying one device, I ripped all of my music to my DROID at 64 kbps. In the environments I often listen in (Airports, Planes, Rental Cars, Taxi's, etc.) this is good enough for me and has the great benefit of using minimal storage space. The efficiency of a codec that provides satisfactory audio quality while using lower bitrates appeals to me.
My question is whether this codec is still being developed and "tuned"? I guess I am curious as to whether HE-AAC is now about as good as it will ever get. For example, is the crossover point from real sound to where the SBR begins as finely tuned as possible? Will we ever get to the point where a 48 kbps rip is perceived qualitatively by a general audience like a 128 kbps AAC file is today? Thanks! |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jun 26 2012, 03:39
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 7 Joined: 23-May 12 Member No.: 100087 |
Is there a reference or an explanation somewhere for what frequency SBR begins when using HE AAC? It would seem to me that the LC "cut point" would be higher in frequency the higher the bit rate used, so that 48 kbps HE AAC has more use of SBR, relatively, than 80 kbps? Is this correct?
|
|
|
|
Jun 26 2012, 17:20
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Developer Posts: 618 Joined: 6-December 08 From: Erlangen Germany Member No.: 64012 |
Is there a reference or an explanation somewhere for what frequency SBR begins when using HE AAC? It would seem to me that the LC "cut point" would be higher in frequency the higher the bit rate used, so that 48 kbps HE AAC has more use of SBR, relatively, than 80 kbps? Is this correct? Correct. The SBR start (or cross-over) frequency is chosen by the HE-AAC encoder from a table of possible frequencies (or rather, fractions of the sampling rate). The creation of the table is described in the ISO/IEC standard and a bit complicated, so I won't go into detail. Just so much: the minimum start frequency is around 4 kHz, the maximum is half the sampling rate (in "downsampled" SBR mode) or a quarter of the sampling rate ("normal" SBR mode). So what saratoga mentioned is just one possible - and rare - configuration. Chris -------------------- If I don't reply to your reply, it means I agree with you.
|
|
|
|
Jun 26 2012, 19:03
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 4135 Joined: 2-September 02 Member No.: 3264 |
Is there a reference or an explanation somewhere for what frequency SBR begins when using HE AAC? It would seem to me that the LC "cut point" would be higher in frequency the higher the bit rate used, so that 48 kbps HE AAC has more use of SBR, relatively, than 80 kbps? Is this correct? Correct. The SBR start (or cross-over) frequency is chosen by the HE-AAC encoder from a table of possible frequencies (or rather, fractions of the sampling rate). The creation of the table is described in the ISO/IEC standard and a bit complicated, so I won't go into detail. Just so much: the minimum start frequency is around 4 kHz, the maximum is half the sampling rate (in "downsampled" SBR mode) or a quarter of the sampling rate ("normal" SBR mode). So what saratoga mentioned is just one possible - and rare - configuration. I didn't realize that. How does that work with LC backwards compatibility? Would you get a badly distorted file when listening on an LC only decoder? |
|
|
|
Jun 26 2012, 19:32
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Developer Posts: 618 Joined: 6-December 08 From: Erlangen Germany Member No.: 64012 |
I didn't realize that. How does that work with LC backwards compatibility? Would you get a badly distorted file when listening on an LC only decoder? Depends on what you consider "badly distorted". It's playable but the frequency bandwidth is limited to that of the AAC LC core coder signal, so it will sound dull/muffled. If the SBR cross-over frequency is 4 kHz, it will probably sound like coming from a telephone on an LC-only decoder. Chris -------------------- If I don't reply to your reply, it means I agree with you.
|
|
|
|
GreenSeer HE AAC Audio Quality & Tuning May 23 2012, 15:39
Garf Which codec?
HE-AAC is a standard. There are seve... May 23 2012, 15:54
GreenSeer QUOTE (Garf @ May 23 2012, 09:54) Which c... May 23 2012, 18:59
IgorC QUOTE (GreenSeer @ May 23 2012, 11:39) My... May 23 2012, 17:31
C.R.Helmrich QUOTE (IgorC @ May 23 2012, 18:31) For HE... May 27 2012, 11:03
IgorC Chris,
The Average scores are:
Apple HE-AAC - 2.... May 28 2012, 16:22
C.R.Helmrich Awesome, thanks a lot, Igor!
QUOTE (IgorC ... May 29 2012, 20:47
C.R.Helmrich QUOTE (C.R.Helmrich @ May 29 2012, 21:47)... Jun 22 2012, 16:00
sluggy QUOTE (C.R.Helmrich @ Jun 22 2012, 15:00)... Jun 22 2012, 21:43
benski QUOTE (sluggy @ Jun 22 2012, 16:43) Hi i ... Jun 22 2012, 21:56
sluggy QUOTE (benski @ Jun 22 2012, 20:56) QUOTE... Jun 22 2012, 22:08
IgorC Good news.
Eagerly waiting to get home and try it.... Jun 22 2012, 19:45
saratoga QUOTE (GreenSeer @ Jun 25 2012, 22:39) Is... Jun 26 2012, 04:07
benski Side note: This is also the rationale behind the s... Jun 26 2012, 20:11
GreenSeer In my recent experience, there is a surprisingly l... Jun 26 2012, 21:00
IgorC QUOTE (GreenSeer @ Jun 26 2012, 17:00) An... Jun 27 2012, 01:17
GreenSeer I may try to do this if I can spare the time - are... Jun 27 2012, 01:50

db1989 QUOTE (GreenSeer @ Jun 27 2012, 01:50) ar... Jun 27 2012, 06:34
GreenSeer Some time ago I've performed a personal blind... Jun 30 2012, 01:03
lvqcl The crossover frequency for Apple HE-AAC (CVBR 64 ... Jun 27 2012, 00:26![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 07:10 |